Carl J. Hartmann III | Attorney    
 
 
HOME BACKGROUND CASES REFERENCES PRESS CONTACT US
   
Home Page Image

Original USVI Partnership Statute

 

"no reasonable jury could find that
Defendant's 1992 tax returns were not among the documents available for review in 2003
in U.S. v. United Corporation, el al., as asserted by Defendant in his Motion for Summary
Judgment. 14 It appears that no other material fact necessary to the Court's determination
on the merits here is in dispute."

--Judge Dunston's SJ Decision, 9/22/14

 

 

 


United v. Willie Hamed - STT Docket & Documents

Date Filed

DE#

Filer

Document(s)

Docket Entry

[Exhibits attached to the documents]

         
10/26/2016 SuperiorSTT Court

SJ Opinion

Dismissed

 
9/14/2016 SuperiorSTT Hamed

Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

 
9/12/2016 SuperiorSTT Yusuf

Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice

 
8/23/2016 SuperiorSTT Yusuf

Notice of Appearance by DTF

 
5/11/2016 SuperiorSTT Hamed

Reply to Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment

 

Notice of Filing in Other Division
5/2/2016 SuperiorSTT United

Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment

 

 
4/15/2016 SuperiorSTT United

Reply re consolidation

 

 
3/29/2016 SuperiorSTT Hamed

Opposition to Motion to Consolidate

 

Crossfiled in STX in main case 370
3/23/2016 SuperiorSTT Hamed

Motion and Memorandum for Summary Judgment

 

Notice of Filing in other division
3/17/2016 SuperiorSTT Yusuf

Motion to Consolidate with Main 370 Case

 

Crossfiled in STX in main case 370
3/2/2016 SuperiorSTT Hamed

Entry of Appearance by Mark Eckard

 

 
1/12/2016 Supreme Court

VI Supreme Court Decision to Remand

Westlaw Version

United Corporation v. Waheed Hamed, 2016 WL 154893, at *7 (Jan. 12, 2016)
5/14/2015 Supreme Court

Order scheduling Oral Argument

 

Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 10 a.m. on St. Thomas
5/15/2015 Supreme United

Reply Brief on appeal

 

 
5/14/2015 Supreme Court

Order denying Motion to Dismiss

 

 
4/30/2015 Supreme Hamed

Appellee Hamed's Brief in Opposition

 

 
4/30/2015 Supreme Hamed

Hamed's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

 

 
4/40/2015 Supreme Joint

Joint Appendix (filed by DeWood)

 

--OCR Version--
4/20/2015 Supreme Yusuf

Yusuf Appellant's Brief in Chief

 

--OCR Version--
3/10/2015 Supreme Court

Scheduling Order

 

Because no transcripts were ordered pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 10 and 11, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules ll(b) and 40.30), the Clerk of the Superior Court SHALL FILE THE E-RECORD on or before March 20, 2015. It is further
ORDERED that, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25,
1. Appellant SHALL FILE AND SERVE Appellant's Brief and the Joint Appendix within forty ( 40) days on or before April 20, 2015.
2. Appellee SHALL FILE AND SERVE Appellee's Brief within thirty (30) days after filing and service of Appellant's Brief.
3. Appellant MAY FILE AND SERVE Appellant's Reply Brief, if any, within fourteen (14) days after filing and service of Appellee's Brief.
2/26/2015 Supreme Court

Transmittal of Docket and Order

 

 
2/24/2015 Supreme Court

Docketing Order

 

 
2/24/2015 Supreme United

Notice of Appeal

 

 
10/7/2014 STT United

Reply re Motion to Reconsider

 

 
10/6/2014 STT United

Motion to Stay Atty Fees and Costs pending Motion to Reconsider

 

 
10/6/2014 STT Court

Dunston Order setting Scheduling for Briefing of Motion to Reconsider

 

Plaintiff having filed a Motion for Reconsideration and to Alter or Amend Judgment on September 29, 2014; it is
ORDERED that Defendant shall respond to the Motion by October 27, 2014, and Plaintiff may reply by November 7, 2014
10/5/2014 STT Hamed

D Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration under Rule 59

 

 
9/29/2014 STT United

P Motion for Reconsideration under Rule 59

 

 
09/16/2014 STT Hamed

D Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs

 

Filed 9/18, served 9/16
09/02/2014 STT Court

SJ Decision dismissing case

 

Entered 9/4/14
05/14/2014 STT Court

Order Requiring P to Oppose Motion to Dismiss for standing

 

 
04/25/2014 STT Court

ORDER - Requiring Supp Briefing by Plaintiff re Aff from FBI

 

 
04/22/2014 STT Hamed

Motion to Dismiss for Lack of United's Standing

 

 
04/16/2014 STT Hamed

Reply as to SJ

 

 
4/7/2014 STT United

Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment

 

 
3/6/2014 STT United

Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to SJ (to April 7th, 2014)

 

Unopposed
3/5/2014 STT Hamed

Notice of Service of Interrogatories, RPD and Requests to Admit of 2/12/14

(Cover letter to Clerk)

 

 
2/12/2014 STT Hamed

Hamed's Responses for Documents

 

Word
2/12/2014 STT Hamed

Hamed's Responses to Interrogatories

 

Word
2/12/2014 STT Hamed

Hamed's Responses to Requests to Admit

 

Word
2/11/2014 STT Court Order- Briefing Schedule for Hamed SJ Motion

Defendants having filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on February 5, 2014, it is
ORDERED that by March 7, 2014, Plaintiff shall respond to the Motion, and Defendant
may file a reply by March 21, 2014; and it is
ORDERED that copies of this Order shall be directed to counsel of record.

 

1/31/2014 STT Hamed

Motion for Summary Judgment (Statute of Limitations)

 

Cover Letter to Clerk in WORD

Motion in WORD, Memo in Word, Order in Word

12/16/2013 STT Joint

Stipulation to Extend United's Responses to Hamed's Discovery

 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME AS TO DISCOVERY

At the request of the Plaintiff, the parties have agreed and hereby stipulate to an enlargement of time in which to file responses to all written and other discovery, admissions and depositions as follows:
1. Plaintiff will file responses and notice any depositions at a time convenient to it within
the bounds of the Court's Scheduling Order( s ).
2. Defendant will thereafter have thirty (30) days to do the same.
3. Defendant's Counsel, Carl J. Hartmann, III, Esq., has agreed to have Plaintiffs
Counsel, Nizar A. De Wood, Esq., sign and file on behalf of both Parties.
Dated: December 16th, 2013
11/15/2013 STT United

Interrogatories to Willie Hamed

 

 
11/15/2013 STT United

Requests to Admit to Willie Hamed

 

 
11/15/2013 STT United

Request for documents to Willie Hamed

 

 
10/9/2013 STT United

Interrogatory Responses

 

Maher Yusuf Verification Addendum filed on 10/10/2013
10/9/2013 STT United

Request for Production of Documents Response

 

 
10/7/2013 STT United

Request to Admit Response

 

 
08/23/2013 STT Hamed

D's First Request for Prod of Documents

 

Word version
08/23/2013 STT Hamed

D's First Requests for Admissions

 

Word version
08/23/2013 STT Hamed

D's First Interrogatories

 

Word version
08/19/2013 STT Hamed

Defendant Hamed's Rule 26 Self-Disclosures

 

 
08/06/2013 STT Court Scheduling and Mediation Order

Discovery schedule contained in the Proposed Stipulated Scheduling Order is hereby approved and adopte

1. By July 1, 2014, the parties may stipulate as to the designation of a certified or qualified mediator. They shall promptly notify the Court if they cannot agree upon a mediator, whereupon Court shall appoint one.
2. After the appointment of a mediator, the Court or its designee, who may be the mediator, shall notify the parties in writing of the date, time, and place of the first mediation conference.
3. Before serving, the mediator shall take the oath or affirmation similar to that administered to officials of the Superior Court.
4. Mediation shall be completed by September 1, 2014, unless extended by order of Court.
5. In the absence of a written agreement providing for the mediator's compensation, the mediator shall be compensated at an hourly rate to be determined by the Presiding Judge. Plaintiff shall pay fifty percent (50%) and Defendant shall pay fifty percent (50%) or such proportionate share of the total charges of the mediator as may be agreed upon, unless the mediator and/or the court
determines that one party has not mediated in good faith.
6. Discovery may continue throughout mediation.
7. The parties shall mediate in good faith.
8. The parties shall cause the mediator to file a Mediation Report with the Court by September 5, 2014, failing which the parties shall notify the Court in writing of the outcome of the . mediation by that date;

1. RULE 26 DISCLOSURES
The parties shall serve disclosures, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 26(a)(i), by September 1, 2013.
2. FACTUAL DISCOVERY
All factual discovery, including written discovery and fact witness depositions, shall be completed by April 1, 2014,
2. PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORTS
Plaintiffs expert disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2), if any, shall be submitted by May 1, 2014.
3. DEFENDANT'S EXPERT REPORTS
Defendant's expert disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Proci:idure 26(a)(2), if any, shall be submitted by June 30, 2014.
4. EXPERT DEPOSITIONS
Depositions of experts .and other health care providers shall be completed by July 30, 2014.
5. MEDIATION
Mediation shall be completed not later than September 1, 2014.
6. MOTIONS
All dispositive motions shall be.filed byN1:wember 1, 2014.
7. STATUS CONFERENCE.
A status conference will be held as schedl.lled by the Court
8. TRIAL DATE
A trial date will be scheduled by the Court.

07/10/2013 STT Joint

Proposed Scheduling Order

 

Sent by Hartmann with cover Letter to Judge Dunston
07/25/2013 STT Hamed

Answer to Amended Complaint

 

WORD Version and Cover Letter to clerk in Word
07/15/2013 STT United First Amended Complaint

Removed the $70k claim

 

06/24/2013 STT Court Order for Sceduling Order Defendant having filed an Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint on March 20, 2013, but no scheduling order having been entered, it is ORDERED that by July 12, 2013, the parties shall conduct a Scheduling Conference pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and shall submit to the Court by
June 19, 2013, a written report setting forth a proposed discovery plan and proposed scheduling order approving the same and adopting it as the Scheduling Order in this case; and it is ORDERED that copies of this Order shall be directed to counsel of record.
06/24/2013 STT Court

Memorandum and Order dismissing $70,000 claim and allowing "other business' claim subject to dismissal of motion to dismiss without prejudice

 

Memorandum and Order dismissing $70,000 claim and allowing "other business' claim subject to dismissal of motion to dismiss without prejudice
06/04/2013 STT Hamed

Reply to Opposition for Motion to Dismiss on Pleadings

 

 
  STT United

Revised Certificate of Service

 

Showing May 21, 2013 as actual service date
05/01/2013 STT United

Opposition for Motion to Dismiss on Pleadings

 

Not served until May 21, 2013
03/05/2013 STT Hamed

Defendant Hamed's Motion to Dismiss on Pleadings

 

 
03/05/2013 STT United

Complaint

 

There are five counts in the complaint seeking relief for breach of fiduciary duty, constructive trust/recoupment, breach of contract, conversion and accounting.