Carl J. Hartmann III | Attorney    
 
 
HOME BACKGROUND CASES REFERENCES PRESS CONTACT US
   
Home Page Image

Original USVI Partnership Statute

VI Supreme Court Docket

Most Recent DOCKET SHEET

"But I want you please to be aware that my partner’s with me since 1984, and up to now his name is not in my corporation.  And that -- excuse me and that prove my honesty.  Because if I was not honest, my brother-in-law will not let me control his 50 percent.  And I know very well, my wife knows, my children knows, that whatever Plaza Extra owns in assets, in receivable or payable, we have a 50 percent partner." --Reply re Opposition to Motion to Remand DE19-14

"2. No funds will be disbursed from supermarket operating accounts without the mutual
consent of Hamed and Yusuf (or designated representative( s) ).
3. All checks from all Plaza Extra Supermarket operating accounts will reqmre two
signatures, one of a designated representative of Hamed and the other of Yusuf or a
designated representative of Yusuf." PI Opinion 4/25/13

 

 
 

 

 

Hamed/KAC357 v. BNS/Yusufs/United - SX-16-CV-429 (Judge Brady)

DUE TO THE UPGRADES IN THE US VIRGIN ISLAND'S COURT DOCKETING SYSTEM

This docket's coverage of this case was suspended on  2/1/2025

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date Filed

DE#

Filer

Document(s)

Comments      

[Exhibits attached to the documents]
         
7/22/2024  STX  Hartmann Declaration in Support of Motion to Withdraw

  Proposed Order in Word
7/10/2024  STX  Hamed  Hartmann Motion to Withdraw

  Word
2/13/2020  STX  Hamed  Request for Hearing and Status conference as to SJ Motion

 
6/18/2018  STX BNS  BNS Discovery Responses to Pf Hamed's 1st Request for Admissions

  Notice of Filing of Signature Pages for all Three
6/18/2018  STX BNS  BNS Discovery Answers    to Pf Hamed's 1st Interrogatories

  
6/18/2018  STX BNS  BNS Discovery Responses to Pf Hamed's 1st Request for Production of Documents   
3/13/2018 STX Joint

BNS-Hamed Joint Stip to 30 days extension for BNS to file discovery responses

 

 BNS shall have an extension of time up to and including Monday, April 9, 2018 to respond to the discovery requests propounded by the Plaintiff, and that the Plaintiff will file his supplement to his previously filed Opposition to the BNS Motion to Dismiss within 21 days thereafter, or by Monday, April 30, 2018
3/5/2018 STX Hamed Plaintiff Hamed's Notice to the Court re Inability to Comply with Order and Request for Instructions

 
2/9/2018 STX  Yusuf Reply to Hamed Opposition re SJ

Contains an attempt to file revised Motion for SJ
1/12/2018 STX Hamed Opposition to Yusuf Motion for Summary Judgment

 
12/6/2017 STX Yusuf Yusuf response re RPD

 
12/6/2107 STX Yusuf Yusuf reponse re Interrogatories

 
12/6/2017 STX Yusuf Yusuf response re RFA

  
11/6/2017 STX Hamed Court-ordered discovery 6 of 6
To Yusuf - RFA

  
11/6/2017 STX Hamed Court-ordered discovery 5 of 6 - To Yusuf - RFPD

  
11/6/2017 STX Hamed Court-ordered discovery 4 of 6 - To Yusuf - Interrogs

  
11/6/2017 STX Hamed Court-ordered discovery 3 of 6 - To BNS - RFA

  
11/6/2017 STX Hamed Court-ordered discovery 2 of 6 - To BNS - RFPD

  
11/6/2017 STX Hamed Court-ordered discovery 1 of 6 - To BNS - Interrogs

 Notice of filing of six discovery documents
10/31/2017 STX Court Order converting Motion to Dismiss to Summary Judgment and allowing Discovery

ORDERED that BNS's Motion to Dismiss is converted to a Motion for Summary Judgment.

It is further ORDERED that Yusuf Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is converted to a Motion for Summary Judgment.

It is further ORDERED that BNS Discovery Motion is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Yusufs' Discovery Motion is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Enter Scheduling Order is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that within 30 days of entry of this Order, Plaintiffs may submit written discovery requests to BNS, which may include discovery requests previously tendered to BNS; and BNS shall have 30 days from the date of service within which to provide to Plaintiffs responses to such discovery.

It is further ORDERED that within 30 days of entry of this Order, Plaintiffs may submit written discovery requests to Yusuf Defendants, which may include discovery requests previously tendered to Yusuf Defendants; and Yusuf Defendants shall have 30 days from the date of service within which to provide to Plaintiffs responses to such discovery.

It is further ORDERED that within 21 days_ of service of discovery respnses by BNS and by Yusuf Defendants to any supplemental discovery tendered, Plaintiffs may supplement their previously filed Oppositions to the BNS Motions to Dismiss and the Yusuf Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, both now converted to Motions for Summary Judgment; and thereafter within 14 days of service, BNS and Yusuf Defendants may file replies to any supplemental filings of Plaintiffs.

8/25/2017 STX Hamed Notice of 30-b-6 Deposition of BNS

Monday, September 18,2017 at 10:30 AM
8/25/2017 STX Hamed Withdrawal of Notice of Depo of BNS

 
8/8/2017 STX Yusuf Reply re Motion to Stay Discovery

 
8/7/2017 STX Hamed Reply to BNS Opp to Entry of Rule 26 Scheduling Order

 
7/31/2017 STX Hamed

BNS Reply re its Mot to Stay Discovery

BNS Opp to Entry of Rule 26 Scheduling Order

  
7/21/2017 STX Hamed Notice of 30-b-6 Deposition of ScotiaBank

  
7/19/2017 STX

Hamed

Hamed Opposition to Yusuf/United Motion to Stay Discovery

  
7/17/2017 STX

Hamed

Notice of Supplemental Authority - New Notice Pleading Standard after Mills-Williams v. Mapp

  
7/14/2017 STX

Yusuf

Yusuf's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Outcome of Motion to Dismiss

  
7/14/2017 STX

Yusuf

Yusuf's filing of Proposed Scheduling Order

  
7/7/2017 STX

Hamed

Opposition to Motion to Stay Discovery

  
7/5/2017 STX BNS

Motion for Stay of Discovery

  
6/9/2017 STX Hamed Rule 26 Self-Disclosure

 
5/3/2017 STX Yusuf Response to Notice of Supplemental Authority

 
4/18/2017 STX Hamed Hamed's Notice of Supplemental Authority (Rule 12)

 
4/12/2017 STX Yusuf Reply by Yusuf as to Motion to Dismiss

 
3/22/2017 STX Hamed Opposition to Yusuf/United Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint

 
3/22/2017 STX Hamed Opposition to BNS Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint

 
3/9/2017 STX Yusuf Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint

 
3/9/2017 STX BNS Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint

 
1/30/2017 STX Hamed Verified First Amended Complaint



Notice w/ Redline

Corporate Disclosure

Added Maher, Fathi and Yusuf Yusuf as Defendants.

Added KAC357, Inc. a Plaintiff

1/30/2017 STX Hamed Opposition to Motion to Dismiss as Moot

 
1/17/2017 STX Yusuf Motion to Dismiss

  
9/9/2016 STX Court

Order allowing stipulated time to answer to 9/30/16

 
8/5/2016 STX Hamed

Return of Service and Stamped Summons

 

  
8/2/2016 STX Court

Docketing Letter

sx-13-cv-152

Judge Brady

 
8/1/2016 STX Hamed

Complaint