Carl J. Hartmann III  | ATTORNEY   In re: Red Mud Claims  SX-2020-MC-00009  
    Home Background Cases          References Contact Us  
               
    Court Superior Court of the Virgin Islands
    Case Title In re: Red Mud Claims
    Filed 2/3/2020
    Case Type Civil - Tort - Complex Litigation
    Judge Andrews, Alphonso G., Hon., Jr.
   
               
    Submitted Date Filed Date Filing Party Document Description (In Court Docket) Document Description (Ours) Caption + Detail Court Hyperlink
  SCRG won a judgment of more than $28 million from Alcoa/SCA -- 3/11/2022 3/11/2022  -- filed in 550 case Howmet SCA Response - Response to Opposition Howmet SCA Opposition to Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement Document Links
  SCRG gave up that judgment in return for Alcoa/SCA completely 2/25/2022 2/25/2022  -- filed in 550 case Plaintiffs Notice - Proposed Order   Document Links
  restoring the waste areas and returning them to grassland 2/25/2022 2/25/2022  -- filed in 550 case Plaintiffs Motion - Opposition Motion Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement Document Links
 
  1/7/2022 1/10/2022  -- filed in 550 case Howmet SCA Motion - Motion to Dismiss Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement to dismiss because prior orders in case do not allow addition of defendants Document Links
    1/7/2022 1/10/2022  -- filed in 550 case Howmet SCA Motion - Memorandum Of Law Received Howmet Memo of Law in support of Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement because prior orders in case do not allow addition of defendants Document Links
    11/22/2021 11/23/2021 Howmet Aerospace, Inc. fka Alcoa, Inc.  Service - Summons Received Summons  Document Links
    11/15/2021 11/15/2021 Clerk  Notice - Notice of Entry of Judgment/Order Notice Of Entry Of Order Document Links
    11/15/2021 11/15/2021 Judge Andrews Order - Order Granting Order - Plaintiffs shail have 60 days for the date of this Order to complete proper service Alcoa Inc n/k/a Howmet Aerospace Inc Document Links
    9/29/2021 9/30/2021 Judge Andrews Notice - Proposed Order Order Granting Extension of Time to Serve Alcoa, Inc. n/k/a Howmet Aerospace, Inc. Plaintiffs shail have 60 days for the date of this Order to complete
proper service Alcoa Inc n/k/a H<;3vLmetAerospace In
Document Links
    9/29/2021 9/30/2021 Plaintiffs Motion - Motion for Extension of Time Motion For Extension Of Time To Serve Alcoa, Inc NKA Howmet Aerospace, Inc.  Document Links
    9/7/2021 9/8/2021 Plaintiffs Response - Response Response To Motion To Quash  Document Links
    8/5/2021 8/5/2021 Clerk  Notice - Notice of Entry of Judgment/Order Notice Of Entry Of Order Document Links
    8/4/2021 8/5/2021 Judge Andrews Order - Order Granting Order  Document Links
    8/4/2021 8/4/2021   Notice - Proposed Order Order  Document Links
    8/4/2021 8/4/2021 Plaintiffs Motion - Motion for Extension of Time Unopposed First Motion For Extension Of Time Document Links
    7/23/2021 7/26/2021 Judge Andrews Notice - Proposed Order Order On Motion To Quash  o quash
service of process upon it on the grounds that it is not a party to the action
Document Links
    7/23/2021 7/26/2021 Alcoa Corporation  Motion - Motion Received Motion To Quash Serv Document Links
    4/22/2021 4/22/2021 Clerk  Notice - Notice of Entry of Judgment/Order Notice Of Entry Of Order Document Links
    4/22/2021 4/22/2021 Judge Willocks Order - Order Order  Document Links
    4/19/2021 4/20/2021 Alcoa, Inc.   Notice - Notice Of Service Notion of Proof Of Service Document Links
    4/6/2021 4/6/2021 Alcoa Corporation  Service - Summons Issued Summons  Document Links
    3/31/2021 3/31/2021 Alcoa Corporation  Service - Summons Received Summons  Document Links
    12/30/2020 12/30/2020 SCRG Answer - Answer SCRG’S Master Answer To The First Amended Complaint Document Links
    12/15/2020 12/15/2020 Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (Exhibit to Notice) Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint - Adding SCA and Alcoa as Defendants & Removing Asbestos Document Links
    12/15/2020 12/15/2020 Plaintiffs Notice - Notice of Filing Notice Of Filing Stipulated Amended Complaint (with Amended Complaint and Comparison Copy as exhibits - see above) Document Links
    10/1/2020 10/4/2020 SCRG Motion - Motion to Dismiss SCRG’S Rule 12 Motion To Dismiss Document Links
    10/2/2020 10/2/2020 Clerk  Notice - Notice of Entry of Judgment/Order Notice Of Entry Of Order Document Links
    10/2/2020 10/2/2020 SCRG Order - Order Stipulation To Extend Time To Answer The New 219 Complaints  Document Links
    8/14/2020 8/14/2020 SCRG Notice - Stipulation Received Stipulation To Extend Time To Answer The New 219 Complaints  Document Links
    5/22/2020 5/22/2020 All Plaintiffs Notice - Notice of Appearance Notice Of Appearance  Document Links
    5/21/2020 5/21/2020 SCRG Notice - Stipulation Received Stipulation To Extend Time To Answer The New 219 Complaints  Document Links
    5/11/2020 5/11/2020 Plaintiffs Notice - Notice of Filing Notice Of Filing Certificate Of Service Of Certain Complaints Document Links
    4/13/2020 4/13/2020 Clerk  Notice - Notice of Entry of Judgment/Order Notice Of Entry Of Order Document Links
    4/13/2020 4/13/2020 Judge Molloy Order - Order Order  Document Links
    2/12/2020 2/12/2020 SCRG Response - Objection Received Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group’s Notice Of Objections To February 3rd Order Document Links
    2/12/2020 2/12/2020 SCRG Notice - Notice of Appearance Notice Of Appearance  Document Links
    2/3/2020 2/3/2020 Not In Court Docket  Initiating Document - Civil Complaint Not In Court Docket  Document Links
    2/3/2020 2/3/2020 Not In Court Docket  Financial - Filing Fee Assess Not In Court Docket  Document Links
    2/3/2020 2/3/2020 Clerk  Notice - Notice Of Entry Notice Of Entry Of Order  Document Links
    2/3/2020 2/3/2020 Judge Molloy Order - Order Signed Order  Document Links
    2/3/2020 2/3/2020 Judge Molloy Order - Order Signed Order  Document Links
    2/3/2020 2/3/2020 Not In Court Docket  Action - Direct Judge Assignment Not In Court Docket  Document Links
   
    In 2020 the VI Superior Court adopted its own Docketing System. It is located at: https://usvipublicaccess.vicourts.org/search/case
   
    Date Filed DE# Filer Document(s) Docket Entry
     
    [All Exhibits are attached to the documents]
     
    -------------- -------------------- ---------- ------------------------ From Two Prior Dockets Below:
    2/3/2020 SuperSTX Molloy  Court  Orders Removing SCRG from old Red Dust Cases and Beginning New Master Case out of the Abraham (550) Main Order in 620
       
    (Combined) Removal from 620
       
      Order to Clerk on New Case  (Master) SX-20-MC-9
       
      Main Controlling Order with Dates in 550
       
      Main Memorandum in 550
    3/22/2019 SuperSTX Molloy Defendants Defendants' Proposed Discovery Order  
   
    3/22/2019 SuperSTX Molloy Defendants Notice to Court re Defendants Proposed Discovery Order  
   
    3/21/2019 SuperSTX Molloy SCRG SCRG's Amended Party Information form  
   
    3/15/2019 SuperSTX Molloy Plaintiffs Plaintiffs' Opposition (with suggestions) as to Defendants' Proposed Scheduling Order  
   
    3/14/2019 SuperSTX Molloy SCRG SCRG's Reply re Show Cause Order as to disposition of "Eleanor Abraham" plaintiffs  
   
    3/13/2019 SuperSTX Molloy Other Defendants Response Of Defendants Alcoa Inc. N/K/A Arconic Inc., St. Croix Alumina, Llc, And Glencore Ltd. To Plaintiffs’ Motion To Permit Use Of Prior Depositions Pursuant To V.I. R. Civ. P. 32(A)(8)  
   
    3/13/2019 SuperSTX Molloy Plaintiffs Rohn Response to Molloy Show Cause Order re Remaining "Eleanor Abraham" Plaintiffs  
   
    3/1/2019 SuperSTX Molloy Plaintiffs Rohn Reply as to Use of Past Depos and Materials  
   
    2/22/2019 SuperSTX Molloy Court Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group's Response To Plaintiffs’ Filing As To Use Of Prior Depositions And Materials As a WORD Document
   
    2/19/2019 SuperSTX Molloy Court Judge Molloy's Opinion as to SCRG Motion to Consolidate - Requiring Rohn filing in 21 days Westlaw Version
   
    2/18/2019 SuperSTX Molloy Defendants Motion for additional Time as to discovery scheduling Order  
   
    2/18/2019 SuperSTX Molloy Rohn Brief as to Use of Past Depositions and Mterials as Ordered by Court  
   
    1/28/2019 SuperSTX Rohn Motion for Order that Plaintiffs May Prove Causation Through their Testimony  
   
    1/24/2019 SuperSTX Hearing Transcript of Hearing before Judge Molloy re status and scheduling order  
   
    1/24/2019 SuperSTX Rohn Motion to allow proof without expert testimony  
   
    11/7/2018 SuperSTX Court- Molloy Notice of Hearing 2 pm on Thurs., January 24, 2019 - and Request re Recusal of Judge  
   
    11/5/2018 SuperSTX Court- Dunston Dunston Orders Transferring Red Dust Master Case and included cases to Complex Lit Div and Judge Molloy  
   
    7/24/2018 SuperSTX Court- Brady Brady Order Postponing Conference and Notice of Impending Transfer to Judge Molloy  
   
    7/20/2018 SuperSTX Court-Brady Order Allowing Telephonic Attendance  
   
    7/17/2018 SuperSTX SCRG Motion to Attend July 26th Status Conf by Telephone Word Version
   
    3/27/2018 SuperSTX SCRG SCRG's 5th (Final) Rule 26 Production - Asbestos Documents  
   
    2/15/2018 SuperSTX SCRG SCRG's 4th Rule 26 Production - SCRG Documents  
   
    2/14/2018 SuperSTX Plaintiffs Opposition to Proposed Discovery Order  
   
    2/9/2018 SuperSTX Plaintiffs Rohn Opposition to Memorandum to the Court as to Counsels Pro Hac Vice Status  
   
   
    2/9/2018 SuperSTX Defendants Defendants' Proposed Discovery Order  
   
   
    2/6/2018 SuperSTX SCRG SCRG’s 3rd Rule 26 production: BioImpact (“BIOI”), VI Department of Public Works (“DPWX”), Natural Resources Consultants Inc. (“NRCI”) and VI Waste Management Authority (“WMAu”) WORD version
   
    2/5/2018 SuperSTX All Joint Report on Discovery (all parties)  
   
    2/4/2018 SuperSTX SCRG SCRG Revised First Rule 26 Third Party Production - DPNR  
   
    2/4/2018 SuperSTX SCRG SCRG Second Rule 26 Third Party Production - Alcoa Insurance  
   
    1/19/2018 SuperSTX Court Two Orders from Judge Brady-- Show Cause and Discovery/Scheduling ORDERED that counsel shall meet and confer and submit a joint proposed Discovery
    Order, no later than February 2, 2018. If the Parties are unable to agree, each Party shall file a
    proposed order within the same time frame.
     
    It is further
    ORDERED that this matter shall come on for a Status Conference on Thursday, July 26,
    2018 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 211.
     
    ORDERED that, within 30 days from the date of entry of this Order, Plaintiffs shall
    show cause, in writing, why this matter should not be dismissed against Defendant Glencore
    International AG, for Plaintiff's failure to serve Defendant Glencore International AG with process.
    1/18/2018 SuperSTX Court Hearing Transcript re Discovery, Pro Hac Vice, P's claims, etc.  
   
    1/17/2018 SuperSTX Glencore & SCA/Alcoa Motion to Allow Off-Island Attys to practice in 432 cases without applying or fees  
   
   
    1/17/2018 SuperSTX Plaintiffs Plaintiffs' Response to D's Report to the Court re Discovery Plan  
   
   
    1/16/2018 SuperSTX Defendants Defendants’ Report to the Court with Exhibit A (Questionnaire) and the Proposed Discovery Order  
    1/10/2018 SuperSTX Plaintiffs 2 Verifications Torres, Catty D. & Berrios, Lucy Perez et al
   
    1/8/2018 SuperSTX COURT Order changing Rule 16 Hearing to 2 pm on 1/18/2018  
   
   
    1/4/2018 SuperSTX Glencore 432 Glencore Red Dust Answers in a Single PDF file - bookmarked there were 2 different Certificates of Service
     
    Cert 2
     
    Sample of Glencore Answer (Lugo)
    1/2/2018 SuperSTX SCA SCA-Alcoa 432 Red Dust Answers Certificate of Service
     
    Sample SCA-Alcoa Answer (Lugo)
    1/2/2018 SuperSTX SCRG SCRG's Certificate of Service in Main Red Dust Case SCRG....certifies that on January 2, 2012, pursuant to the Order of this Court, it did serve its Answers by Dropbox and email as agreed to by the parties, on the 1376 Plaintiffs in the 432 individual sub-cases, as follows: (list of all Plaintiffs and cases)
     
    Sample SCRG Answer (Lugo)
     
    Stamped First Page from Clerk 1/4/2018
    1/2/2018 SuperSTX SCRG 432 SCRG Red Dust Answers in Bookmarked PDF File  
   
    1/2/2018     All Red Dust Complaints as Collected for Answers Collected by Review of Physical Files at Court Clerk 12/28/2017 by Jay Sheen and Andy Simpson
     
    Really large (287 Mb) - Takes a long time to download - 3 min @ HS
     
    Sample new Complaint (Lugo)
    12/29/2017 SuperSTX SCRG SCRG's Revised Certification as to Outstanding Motions and Matters  
   
    12/28/2017 SuperSTX SCRG SCRG's Certification as to Outstanding Motions and Matters Voided by Revision
    12/28/2017 SuperSTX Plaintiffs Motion to reschedule Conference set for January 18th  
   
    12/11/2017 SuperSTX Court Revised Scheduling Order First, any party's failure to adhere to the deadlines in the July 7, 2017 Interim Scheduling Order, as extended by this Court or tolled by the Supreme Court, is EXCUSED.
     
    Second, each Defendant shall file a response to the individual complaints within twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this Order, whether the response is an answer or a motion filed pursuant to Virgin Islands Rule of Civil Procedure 12. All motions filed pursuant to Rule 12 shall be filed per the deadlines set by the rules, with the effective date the date of entry of this Order. In other words, the parties shall proceed as if the date of entry of this Order is the date when service of process occurred for all individual complaints.
     
    Third, any party who previously filed an answer to the claims asserted herein, whether in Abednego, Henry, or Phillip Abraham, is precluded from filing a motion pursuant to Virgin Islands Rule of Civil Procedure 12(6)(2)-(6).
     
    Fourth, each party shall, within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this Order, file a notice in the master case (if not already filed) that: (A) lists by date filed (1) each motion still pending filed by that party; (2) in which case(s) the motion(s) was(were) filed; (3) which parties, if any, joined the motion(s); and (4) the relief sought by each motion and the grounds therefor, e.g., dismissal based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and (B) states whether the party (1) seeks leave to supplement the previously-filed motion(s) or (2) intends to withdraw the previously-filed motion(s) and to refile it.
     
    Fifth, because filing a motion does not necessarily suspend deadlines or excuse parties from complying with court deadlines, and further because "the Henry plaintiffs exchanged discovery with the defendants over the first two years of the litigation, namely between 1999 and 2001, and then for about five more years, the parties traveled the country deposed fact and expert witnesses," Abednego v. St. Croix Alumina, LLC, 63 V.I. 153, 186-87 (Super. Ct. 2015) (brackets, quotation marks, and citations omitted), there remains no reason to delay discovery in these cases. From the bench on August 2, 2017, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer by Monday, October 16, 2017, and to file joint or separate discovery plans by Tuesday, October 31, 20 I 7. Counsel were unable to meet with those deadlines in part due to Hurricanes Irma and Maria. Those deadlines are hereby extended as follows: on or before Friday, January 5, 2018, counsel shall meet and confer pursuant to Virgin Islands Rule of Civil Procedure 26 and serve and file their discovery plans/reports on or before Monday, January 15, 2018. The Rule 16 conference scheduled from the bench on August 2, 2017 will proceed as scheduled on January 18, 2018 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 211.
    8/30/2017 SuperSTX SCRG Motion to Consolidate 550 and 620  
   
      SuperSTX Plaintiffs Additional 12 Complaints Filed  
   
    8/1/2017 SuperSTX Plaintiffs 222 Complaints filed  
    8/1/2017 SuperSTX SCRG Notice of Minor Technical Deficiencies  
    7/21/2017 SuperSTX Century Notice re Existing Motions to Dismiss Stands on existing and seeks leave to amend
    7/21/2017 SuperSTX Glencore Alcoa & SCA Notice re Existing Motions to Dismiss States no new MTD will be filed
    7/7/2017 SuperSTX Court Brady 3 of 3 Orders - 571 ORDERED that the Response to Court Order Regarding Refiled Complaint, filed by Plaintiff
    Laurie L.A. Abednego, through counsel, on September 14, 2016 is CONSTRUED as a motion and
    DENIED as moot. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this Order, Plaintiff Laurie
    L.A. Abednego shall serve and file his verified, amended complaint. Failure to comply will result in
    dismissal.
    7/7/2017 SuperSTX Court Brady 2 of 3 Orders - 163 Conclusion
    For the reasons stated above, the Court will grant Century's January 13, 2016 motion for
    extension of time to move, answer, or otherwise respond, grant Co-Plaintiffs' May 2, 2016 second
    motion for extension of time to file individual verified complaints, and deny Co-Plaintiffs' June 2,
    2016 motion for brief extension of time. The Court will construe Abraham's September 13, 2016
    response to court order and Abednego's September 14, 2016 response to court order as motions and
  grant the first and deny the second as moot. Orders consistent with this opinion follow.
  7/7/2017 SuperSTX Court Brady 1 of 3 Orders - 620 The court lists all of the cases to date:  09-571 (Abednago), 11-163 (Abraham), and 15-621 through 15-827 (total of 208) -- and consolidates them "for pre-trial purposes only" into 620.
   
  Case Management Order and interim Scheduling Order attached.
   
  Case Management Order
   
  Interim Scheduling Order
   
  Westlaw Version
   
   
  7/7/2017 SuperSTX Court Substitutions of Counsel ORDERED that the Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel filed by Defendant Century
  Aluminum Company on September 13, 2013 is GRANTED and Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak &
  Stewart, LLC is RELIEVED as counsel of record in this matter, nunc pro tune. It is further
  ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this Order, David J. Cattie,
  Esq. shall serve and file a notice regarding the status of the pro hac vice admission of Eric C. Schweizer
  Order and take appropriate steps if necessary to cause him to withdraw his appearance in this matter.
   
   
  8/10/2013 SuperSTX Court Opinion Begins with History of Litigation - Opinion in Abdednego v. SCA et. al. - 2015 WL 4760285
           
    STX   Docket July 2017 Docket Sheet for Phillip Abraham SX-2011-CV-163
    STX   Complaint --Original Complaint in Phillip Abraham Case
           
    STX   Docket SX-09-CV-571 - July 2017 VI Superior Docket Sheet for Abednego
           
    Fed Ct   Docket 1:12-cv-00011-HB - Closed Federal Docket Sheet for Eleanor Abraham
           
    Fed Ct   Docket 1:10-cv-00009-H - Closed Federal Case Docket Sheet for Abednego
           
    Fed Ct   Docket 1:99-cv-00036-HB - Closed Federal Case Docket Sheet for Josephat Henry
           
    Fed Ct   Docket 1:06-cv-00154-HB - Closed Federal Case Docket Sheet for Bennington v. SCRG
  ---------------        
  11/26/2013 S.Ct. SCRG Reply re Cert  
  11/21/2013 S.Ct. Plaintiffs Opposition to Petition for Cert  
  11/15/2013 Dist Ct SCRG Notice of Status of Petition  
  10/17/2013 S.Ct. Court Grant of time to November 22 No. 13-116  
  Title: St. Croix Renaissance Group , L.L.L.P., Petitioner
  v.
  Eleanor Abraham, et al.
  Docketed: 26-Jul-13
  Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Case Nos.: (13-1725)
    Decision Date: 17-May-13
   
  ~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Jul 23 2013 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2013)
  Jul 29 2013 Waiver of right of respondents Eleanor Abraham, et al. to respond filed.
  Aug 7 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.
  Sep 23 2013 Response Requested . (Due October 23, 2013)
  Oct 17 2013 Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 22, 2013.
   
   
     
   
   
  ~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   
  Attorneys for Petitioner:
  Carl Joseph Hartmann
   
   
  Party name: St. Croix Renaissance Group , L.L.L.P.
  Attorneys for Respondent:
  Leah M. Nicholls
      Counsel of Record
   
   
  Party name: Eleanor Abraham, et al.
    S.Ct Respond Request for Extension of time to file response  
 
 
  9/23/2013 S.Ct. Court Call for Response (CFR) to Respondents from Supreme Court  
 
 
  7/23/2013 S.Ct. SCRG Notice of Filing of Pet for Cert to DVI  
  7/23/2013 S.Ct. SCRG Petition for Writ of Certiorari  
  5/22/2013 47 SCRG Notice of Intent to File Petition for Cert. NOTICE Intent to File Pet. Cert. by St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P. (Hartmann, Carl)
  5/17/2013 3dCir SCRG Opinion JUDGMENT, Affirmed. Costs taxed against Appellant. (DW)
  5/13/2013 3dCir SCRG SCRG'a Motion to Stay Determination and For Enlargement of Time ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant St Croix Renaissance to stay 28 USC 1453(c) stay and enlargement. Certificate of Service dated 05/13/2013. (CJH)
  4/16/2013 3dCir Court Oral Argument Philadelphia. Oral Argument 3:00 pm before Judges Smith, Ambro and Chagares. In the Maris Courtroom, 19th Floor. PDF Version
  4/1/2013 3dCir SCRG SCRG's Reply Letter Brief ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC REPLY BRIEF on behalf of Appellant St Croix Renaissance, filed. Certificate of Service dated 04/01/2013 by ECF, US mail. (CJH) WORD Version
  3/28/2013 3dCir Plaint Appellees Opposition Brief ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC BRIEF on behalf of Appellee Eleanor Abraham, filed. Certificate of Service dated 03/28/2013 by 3rd party, ECF. (LMN)
  3/21/2013 3dCir Court Notice of Receipt of Hard Copy of Documents (Entry Only) (BRIEF) HARD COPY RECEIVED from Appellant St Croix Renaissance - Letter Brief with Volume I of Appendix attached. Copies: 10. (SJB)
  3/21/2013 3dCir Court Notice of Receipt of Hard Copy of Documents (Entry Only) (APPENDIX) HARD COPY RECEIVED from Appellant St Croix Renaissance - Joint Appendix. Copies: 4. Volumes: 2 (Volume I attached to Letter Brief). (EAF)
  3/20/2013 3dCir SCRG Leah Nicholls - Acknowledgment of Notification of Oral Argument and Desig of Counsel ECF FILER: ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed by Attorney Leah M. Nicholls, Esq. for Appellee Eleanor Abraham. Certificate of Service dated 03/20/2013. (LMN)
  3/20/2013 3dCir SCRG Carl Hartmann - Acknowledgment of Notification of Oral Argument and Desig of Counsel ECF FILER: ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed by Attorney Carl J. Hartmann, III, Esq. for Appellant St Croix Renaissance. Certificate of Service dated 03/20/2013. (CJH)
  3/20/2013 3dCir Court Notice or Scheduling of Oral Argument Calendared for Tuesday, 04/16/2013. (TLW)
  The Court has that oral argument in the above-entitled case is scheduled on the merits on Tuesday, April 16, 2013. Counsel will be allotted 15 minutes oral argument time for each side, pursuant to Rule 12(6) of the Rules of this Circuit. Court will convene at 3:00 PM in The Albert Branson Maris Courtroom (19th Floor, U.S. Courthouse, 6th & Market Sts.) Counsel who will present oral argument should register with the Court Crier in the courtroom 30 minutes prior to the time when court is scheduled to convene.
  3/20/2013 3dCir SCRG Appellant's Brief Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC LETTER BRIEF with Volume I of Appendix attached on behalf of Appellant St Croix Renaissance, filed. Certificate of Service dated 03/20/2013 by hand delivery, ECF. [Text edited]--[Edited 03/20/2013 by EAF] (CJH) WORD Version
   
  w/ Appendix Vol 1 attached
  3/20/2013 3dCir SCRG Appendix Vol 1 (removed by clerk as filed w brief) Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann)
  3/20/2013 3dCir SCRG Appendix Vol 2 Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC JOINT APPENDIX on behalf of Appellant St Croix Renaissance, filed. Certificate of service dated 03/20/2013 by ECF. [Volume I has been removed as it is attached to the Brief]--[Edited 03/20/2013 by EAF] (CJH)
  3/20/2013 3dCir SCRG Hartmann Enrty of Appearance Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Carl J. Hartmann III on behalf of Appellant(s) St. Croix Renaissance Group L.L.L.P. (CJH)
  3/20/2013 3dCir SCRG Holt Entry of Appearance Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Joel H. Holt on behalf of Appellant(s) St. Croix Renaissance Group L.L.L.P.. (CJH)
  3/20/2013 3dCir SCRG Transcript Request form Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant St Croix Renaissance advising this court that no transcripts are available. (CJH)
  3/20/2013 3dCir SCRG Concise Summary of the Case Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant St Croix Renaissance, received. (CJH)
  3/20/2013 3dCir SCRG SCRG Corporate Disclosure Statement Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant St Croix Renaissance, filed. (CJH)
  3/20/2013 3dCir SCRG Civil Appeal Info Statement Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant St Croix Renaissance, filed. (CJH)
  3/20/2013 3dCir Plain Entry of Appearance of Leah Nichools of Public Interest ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Leah M. Nicholls on behalf of Appellee(s) Eleanor Abraham, et al.. (LMN)
   
  Supreme Court Assistance Project Fellow at Public Citizen Litigation Group and clerked for Texas Supreme Court Justice Harriet O'Neill. She is a magna cum laude graduate of Duke University Law School.  She has also clerked for the Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs at the Arizona Center for Disability Law.  She is now the the Kazan-Budd Attorney at PI. She was previously senior staff attorney for civil rights and general public interest at the Georgetown University Law Center's Institute for Public Representation. Leah had also been a teaching fellow and law professor at the Law Center.
  3/14/2013 3dCir Court Case Opening Letter  
  3/14/2013 3dCir Holt Notice of paying Fees ECF FILER: LETTER from Attorney Joel H. Holt, Esq. for Petitioner St Croix Renaissance Petitioner gives notice of having paid filing and docketing fee. Certificate of Service dated 03/14/2013. (JHH)
  3/14/2013 3dCir Court Order Expediting Appeal ORDER (AMBRO, SMITH and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges) The appeal will be EXPEDITED. The parties are hereby ordered to file informal double-spaced letter briefs on the following schedule: 1. Appellant's Letter Brief and Joint Appendix to be filed and served by March 21, 2013: 2. Appellees' Letter Brief to be file and served by March 28, 2013; and 3. Appellant's Reply Brief, if any, to be filed and served by April 02, 2013. Opening briefs must not exceed 20 pages and the reply brief must not exceed 10 pages. The appeal will be calendared before this Panel for oral argument on April 16, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. Panel No.: DCO-038. SMITH, Authoring Judge. (DW)
  3/14/2013 3dCir Court No Document RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (DW)
  3/14/2013 3dCir Court No Document CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Transferred from Misc. No. 12-8114. Notice filed by Appellant St Croix Renaissance in District Court No. 1-12-cv-00011. (DW)
  3/14/2013 3dCir Court Order Granting leave to Appeal ORDER (AMBRO, SMITH and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges) The foregoing Petition is hereby GRANTED. The motion to strike is DENIED. This order granting the petition for leave to appeal will serve as the notice of appeal and will be forwarded to the district court. Petitioner/Appellant must pay the $455.00 docketing and filing fee in the district court within two days of the date of this order. Petitioner/Appellant is directed to notify the Clerk's office, in writing, that the fee has been paid in accordance with this order. Petitioner/Appellant may file the notification electronically in No. 12-8114 using the Letter to the Court event in the Court's electronic case filing (ECF) system. Upon payment, this miscellaneous proceeding will be closed and a new appeal will be opened on the general docket. All filing discussed below must be done electronically in the new appeal. The appeal will be EXPEDITED. The parties are hereby ordered to file informal double-spaced letter briefs on the following schedule: 1. Appellant's Letter Brief and Joint Appendix to be filed and served by March 21, 2013; 2. Appellees' Letter Brief to be filed and served by March 28, 2013; and 3. Appellant's Reply Brief, if any, to be filed and served by April 2, 2013. Opening briefs must not exceed 20 pages and the reply brief must not exceed 10 pages. The appeal will be calendared before this Panel for oral argument on April 16, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. The Clerk is directed to file a copy of this order in the new appeal. , filed. Panel No.: DCO-038. SMITH, Authoring Judge. (DW)
  1/11/2013 3dCir SCRG Petitioner's Reply to -- Respondents’ response in opposition to motion to strike ECF FILER: Reply by Petitioner St Croix Renaissance to Response Response , filed. Certificate of Service dated 01/11/2013. (CJH) WORD
  or in the alternative for leave to file a cross-answer
  in opposition regarding respondents de facto cross
  petition for review of a CAFA remand order pursuant to 28 USC § 1453(c)(1)
  1/10/2013 3dCir Rohn Respondents’ response in opposition to motion to strike ECF FILER: Response filed by Respondent Eleanor Abraham to Motion to Strike, Motion. Certificate of Service dated 01/10/2013. (LJR)
  or in the alternative for leave to file a cross-answer
  in opposition regarding respondents de facto cross
  petition for review of a CAFA remand order pursuant to 28 USC § 1453(c)(1)
  12/27/2012 3dCir SCRG Motion to Strike or in the alternative file a Cross-Answer Motion filed by Petitioner St Croix Renaissance to strike portions of Respondents' Opposition or, alternatively, for leave to file a to Cross-Answer to de facto Cross-Petition. Certificate of Service dated 12/27/2012. (CJH) WORD
  12/21/2012 3dCir Rohn Response to Petition Response filed by Respondent Eleanor Abraham to original proceeding Petition Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1453(c). Certificate of Service dated 12/21/2012. (LJR)
  12/14/2012 43 SCRG Notice of filing of Petition to Third Circuit in 12-8114 NOTICE Of Filing of Petition to Third Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1453(c)(1) by St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Petition, # (2) Exhibit Docket Entry) (Hartmann, Carl)
  12/12/2012 3dCir SCRG Petition for Appeal regarding the Order of Remand PETITION FOR DE NOVO REVIEW OF A CAFA REMAND ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C § 1453(c)(1)(Sent and served on Rohn 12/12/2012) WORD and AS FILED (Docketed 3d Cir. 12/13/2012)
  12/7/2012 42 Court Memorandum re Order Remanding to Superior Court MEMORANDUM OPINION re: [36] Motion for Remand. (HB) dated 12/7/2012 (CB)
  12/7/2012 41 Court Order Remanding to Superior Court ORDER (HB) dated 12/7/2012 granting [36] Motion to Remand. (CB)
  11/16/2012 40 SCRG REPLY [Agreement] to Motion for Extension of Time Nunc Pro Tunc REPLY to Motion for Extension of Time Nunc Pro Tunc filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. Responses due by 11/29/2012 (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 11/16/2012)
  11/16/2012 39 Rohn MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to Opposition to Motion Nunc Pro Tunc MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 37 Opposition to Motion, 38 Reply to Opposition to Motion Nunc Pro Tunc by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Text of Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 11/16/2012)
  11/16/2012 38 Rohn Plaintiffs' Reply to the Opposition to Motion for Remand REPLY to Opposition to Motion re [37] Opposition to Motion filed by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... (Attachments: # (1) xhibit, # (2) Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit) (Rohn, Lee)
  10/29/2012 37 SCRG SCRG's Opposition to Motion for Remand Opposition to Motion re [36] MOTION to Remand /Motion to Remand for Lack of Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit) (Holt, Joel) WORD
  10/24/2012 36 Rohn Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand MOTION to Remand /Motion to Remand for Lack of Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee)
 
 
  10/24/2012 35 Court Scheduling Order for Motion for Remand Minute Order. Proceedings held in chambers before US District Judge Harvey Bartle, III: Telephone Conference held on 0/23/2012. (CB)
  10/24/2012 34 Court Scheduling Order for Motion for Remand ORDER that Plantiffs shall file and serve their motion to remand by 10/30/2012; Defendant shall file an opposition by 11/5/2012; Plaintiff shall file any reply by 11/15/2012. (HB) dated 10/24/2012 (CB) (Entered: 10/24/2012)
  10/23/2012 33 Rohn Emergency Motion to Continue MOTION to Continue /Emergency Motion to Continue the October 23, 2012 Telephone Conference to 4:30 p.m. by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 10/23/2012)
  10/12/2012 32 Court Judge Bartle Assigned ORDER REASSIGNING CASE (CVG) this case is reassigned to Judge Harvey Bartle, III, for all further proceedings. Judge Wilma A. Lewis is no longer assigned to this case. (This is a text entry only. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.) (DHK) (Entered: 10/12/2012)
 
 
  9/25/2012 31 SCRG SCRGs Reply to Plaintiffs Memo in Opp to Motion to Sever REPLY to Opposition to Motion re 28 Opposition to Motion [TO SEVER] filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 09/25/2012)
  9/25/2012 30 SCRG REPLY to Opposition to Motion FOR A MORE REPLY to Opposition to Motion re 29 Opposition to Motion [FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT] filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 09/25/2012)
  DEFINITE STATEMENT
  9/19/2012 29 Rohn Opposition to Motion for More Definite Statement Opposition to Motion re 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 09/19/2012)
  9/19/2012 28 Rohn Opposition to Motion to Sever Opposition to Motion re 16 MOTION to Sever filed by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 09/19/2012)
  9/13/2012 27 SCRG Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 17 Memorandum in Support to Motion Opposition to Motion re 26 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 17 Memorandum in Support to Motion, 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement , 16 MOTION to Sever , 19 Memorandum in Support to Motion filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Hartmann, Carl) (Entered: 09/13/2012)
  9/12/2012 26 SCRG MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 17 Memorandum in Support to Motion, 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement , 16 MOTION to Sever , 19 Memorandum in Support to Motion by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W Cannon. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 09/12/2012)
  9/12/2012 25 SCRG MOTION and Memorandum to Deem Conceded Defendant's Motions to Sever and for a More Definite Statement MOTION and Memorandum to Deem Conceded Defendant's Motions to Sever and for a More Definite Statement re 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement , 16 MOTION to Sever by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W Cannon. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Hartmann, Carl) (Entered: 09/12/2012)
  8/21/2012 24 Rohn MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to MOTION to Sever MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 16 MOTION to Sever by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W Cannon. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 08/21/2012)
  8/21/2012 23 Rohn MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to Mot. for MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W Cannon. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 08/21/2012)
  More Definite Statement
  8/7/2012 22 Rohn First Amended Compliant AMENDED Complaint Plaintiffs' First Amended against All Plaintiffs filed by Eleanor Abraham, et al... (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 08/07/2012)
   
  (re-filed without permission)
   
   
  8/7/2012 21 Rohn NOTICE of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's First Amended Compliant Rohn NOTICE of Withdrawal of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint , Doc No 15 by Eleanor Abraham, et al.. re 15 Amended Complaint (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 08/07/2012)
  8/6/2012 20 SCRG Incorrect filing NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY Re: 20 Reply to. Pleading docketed in wrong case. Should have been docketed in Civil No. 2011/0088. To be corrected by attorney's office. (NH) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
   
  REPLY to [REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT] filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. Responses due by 8/20/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
  8/6/2012 19 SCRG MEMORANDUM in Support re MOTION for More Definite Statement MEMORANDUM in Support re 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C) (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
  8/6/2012 18 SCRG MOTION for More Definite Statement MOTION for More Definite Statement by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W Cannon. (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
  8/6/2012 17 SCRG MEMORANDUM in Support re MOTION to Sever MEMORANDUM in Support re 16 MOTION to Sever filed by Defendant St.
  Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, #
  3 Exhibit C) (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
  8/6/2012 16 SCRG MOTION to Sever MOTION to Sever by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Holt,
  Joel) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
  8/2/2012 15 Rohn (First) AMENDED COMPLAINT Rohn AMENDED Complaint against St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.filed by
    Eleanor Abraham, et al... (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 08/02/2012)
  (But see DE 22) ORDER (GWC) dated 8/1/2012 granting 5 Motion for Leave to File First
    Amended Complaint (KMD) (Entered: 08/01/2012)
  8/1/2012 14 Court ORDER (GWC) dated 8/1/2012 granting Motion for Leave to File First ORDER (GWC) dated 8/1/2012 granting 5 Motion for Leave to File First
  Amended Complaint Amended Complaint (KMD) (Entered: 08/01/2012)
  5/1/2012 13 Court [Order] NOTICE of Response to Plaintiffs' 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File NOTICE of Response to Plaintiffs' 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File.
  (WAL) dated 5/1/2012. (GS) (Entered: 05/01/2012)
  4/16/2012 12 SCRG REPLY to Opposition to Motion for More Definite Statement and for Severence REPLY to Opposition to Motion re 6 Notice (Other) [Motion for More Definite
  Statement and for Severence] filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group,
  L.L.L.P.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit B−1, # 4 Exhibit
  B−2, # 5 Exhibit B−3) (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 04/16/2012)
  4/16/2012 11 SCRG Opposition to Motion to Amend/Correct and leave to file First Opposition to Motion re 5 MOTION to Amend/Correct and leave to file First
  Amended Complaint Amended Complaint filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P..
    (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 04/16/2012)
  4/12/2012 10 Rohn MOTION for Extension of Time to File Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand MOTION for Extension of Time to File Plaintiffs' Third Motion to Remand for
  lack of Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al...
  Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W Cannon. (Attachments: # 1
  Supplement, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Text of Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered:
  04/12/2012)
  3/26/2012 9 Court Order ORDER granting Stipulation 8 . Defendant shall have until April 16, 2012 to file
  its responses to 5 and [6−1]. (GWC) dated 3/26/2012 (CB) (Entered: 03/26/2012)
  3/19/2012 8 SCRG STIPULATION [FOR EXTENSION OF TIME] by SCRG STIPULATION [FOR EXTENSION OF TIME] by St. Croix Renaissance Group,
  L.L.L.P.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Holt, Joel) (Entered:
  03/19/2012)
  3/15/2012 7 SCRG NOTICE of Appearance by Carl J Hartmann, III NOTICE of Appearance by Carl J Hartmann, III on behalf of Defendant St. Croix
  Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P. (Hartmann, Carl) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
  3/15/2012 6 Rohn NOTICE of filing response to Def NOTICE of filing response to Def [doc 1, exh C] by Eleanor Abraham, et al.. re 1
  Notice of Removal (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Response to Def's [1, exh 3])
  (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
  3/15/2012 5 Rohn MOTION to Amend/Correct and leave to file First Amended Complain MOTION to Amend/Correct and leave to file First Amended Complaint by
  Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W
  Cannon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered:
  03/15/2012)
  2/10/2012 4 Rohn [Filing Fee] NOTICE TO THE COURT NOTICE TO THE COURT by Eleanor Abraham, et al.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit
  1) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 02/14/2012)
  Filing fee: $ 350.00, receipt number 100002085 on 2/10/2012 (MB). (Entered:
  02/10/2012)
  2/2/2012 3 SCRG ANSWER to Complaint ANSWER to Complaint by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P..
  (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 02/02/2012)
  2/2/2012 2 SCRG NOTICE of Appearance by Joel H. Holt NOTICE of Appearance by Joel H. Holt on behalf of Defendant St. Croix
  Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P. (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 02/02/2012)
  2/2/2012 1 SCRG Notice of Removal NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.
    from Superior Court of the Virgins Islands, case number 11 − CV − 550. ( Filing
  (with Original Sup. Ct. pleadings attached) Original Super. Ct. Complaint is Ex. A fee $ 350) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C) (Holt, Joel)
    (Entered: 02/02/2012)
    44562   Attachment with Client information to Original Complaint as filed in USVI Superior Court  
3/11/2022  -- filed in 550 case
Howmet SCA
Response - Response to Opposition
Howmet SCA Opposition to Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement
Document Links
   
2/25/2022
2/25/2022  -- filed in 550 case
Plaintiffs
Notice - Proposed Order
 
Document Links
   
2/25/2022
2/25/2022  -- filed in 550 case
Plaintiffs
Motion - Opposition Motion
Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement
Document Links
   
1/7/2022
1/10/2022  -- filed in 550 case
Howmet SCA
Motion - Motion to Dismiss
Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement to dismiss because prior orders in case do not allow addition of defendants
Document Links
   
1/7/2022
1/10/2022  -- filed in 550 case
Howmet SCA
Motion - Memorandum Of Law Received
Howmet Memo of Law in support of Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement because prior orders in case do not allow addition of defendants
Document Links
    11/22/2021 11/23/2021 Howmet Aerospace, Inc. fka Alcoa, Inc.  Service - Summons Received Summons  Document Links   SCRG gave up that judgment in return for Alcoa/SCA completely 11/15/2021 11/15/2021 Clerk  Notice - Notice of Entry of Judgment/Order Notice Of Entry Of Order Document Links   restoring the waste areas and returning them to grassland 11/15/2021 11/15/2021 Judge Andrews Order - Order Granting Order - Plaintiffs shail have 60 days for the date of this Order to complete proper service Alcoa Inc n/k/a Howmet Aerospace Inc Document Links