Carl J. Hartmann III  | ATTORNEY					In re: Red Mud Claims  SX-2020-MC-00009
		Home	Background	Cases	References	Contact Us
		Court	Superior Court of the Virgin Islands			On July 11, 2023, Judge Andrews entered the final Order dismissing SCRG as a Defendant in 220 of the 221 cases in Red Mud.
		Case Title	In re: Red Mud Claims
		Filed	2/3/2020
		Case Type	Civil - Tort - Complex Litigation
		Judge	Andrews, Alphonso G., Hon., Jr.
		Submitted Date	Filed Date	Filing Party	Document Description (In Court Docket)	Document Description (Ours) Caption + Detail	Court Hyperlink
		7/11//2023	7/11/2023	Court	ORDER Dismissing 220 of 221 Red Mud Cases as ti SCRG as Defendant		Document Link
		7/7/2023	7/7/2023	Joint	DISMISSAL OF SCRG AS Defendant	All document to Dismiss SCRG	Document Link
	SCRG won a judgment of more than $28 million from Alcoa/SCA --	11/1/2022	11/3/2022	Plaintiffs’	Response – Reply Motion	Plaintiffs' Reply to Howmet Aerospace, Inc’s Opposition To Motion Requesting Issuance Of Master Summons And Further Extension Of Time To Serve	Document Links
		10/17/2022	10/18/2022	Plaintiffs	Response - Opposition Received	Howmet Aerospace, Inc.’s Opposition To Plaintiffs’ Motion Requesting Issuance Of Master Summons” And Extension Of Time To Serve	Document Links
	SCRG gave up that judgment in return for Alcoa/SCA completely	9/26/2022	9/27/2022	Plaintiffs’	Notice - Proposed Order	Order	Document Links
	restoring the waste areas and returning them to grassland	9/26/2022	9/27/2022	Plaintiffs	Motion - Motion Received	Motion Requesting Issuance Of Master Summons And Further Extension Of Time To Serve V.I.R Civ P.4	Document Links
		8/12/2022	8/12/2022	Clerk	Notice - Notice of Entry of Judgment/Order	Notice Of Entry Of Order	Document Links
		8/12/2022	8/12/2022	Plaintiffs	Order - Order Granting	Order Granting Motion to Quash Plaintiffs’ Service Of Process On Alcoa Corporation July 23, 2021	Document Links
		3/11/2022	3/11/2022  -- filed in 550 case	Howmet SCA	Response - Response to Opposition	Howmet/SCA Reply re Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement	Document Links
		2/25/2022	2/25/2022  -- filed in 550 case	Plaintiffs	Notice - Proposed Order	Order	Document Links
		2/25/2022	2/25/2022  -- filed in 550 case	Plaintiffs	Motion - Opposition Motion	Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement	Document Links
		1/7/2022	1/10/2022  -- filed in 550 case	Howmet SCA	Motion - Motion to Dismiss	Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement to dismiss because prior orders in case do not allow addition of defendants	Document Links
		1/7/2022	1/10/2022  -- filed in 550 case	Howmet SCA	Motion - Memorandum Of Law Received	Howmet Memo of Law in support of Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement because prior orders in case do not allow addition of defendants	Document Links
		11/22/2021	11/23/2021	Howmet Aerospace, Inc. fka Alcoa, Inc.	Service - Summons Received	Summons	Document Links
		11/15/2021	11/15/2021	Clerk	Notice - Notice of Entry of Judgment/Order	Notice Of Entry Of Order	Document Links
		11/15/2021	11/15/2021	Judge Andrews	Order - Order Granting	Order - Plaintiffs shail have 60 days for the date of this Order to complete proper service Alcoa Inc n/k/a Howmet Aerospace Inc	Document Links
		9/29/2021	9/30/2021	Judge Andrews	Notice - Proposed Order	Order Granting Extension of Time to Serve Alcoa, Inc. n/k/a Howmet Aerospace, Inc. Plaintiffs shail have 60 days for the date of this Order to complete proper service Alcoa Inc n/k/a H<;3vLmetAerospace In	Document Links
		9/29/2021	9/30/2021	Plaintiffs	Motion - Motion for Extension of Time	Motion For Extension Of Time To Serve Alcoa, Inc NKA Howmet Aerospace, Inc.	Document Links
		9/7/2021	9/8/2021	Plaintiffs	Response - Response	Response To Motion To Quash	Document Links
		8/5/2021	8/5/2021	Clerk	Notice - Notice of Entry of Judgment/Order	Notice Of Entry Of Order	Document Links
		8/4/2021	8/5/2021	Judge Andrews	Order - Order Granting	Order	Document Links
		8/4/2021	8/4/2021		Notice - Proposed Order	Order	Document Links
		8/4/2021	8/4/2021	Plaintiffs	Motion - Motion for Extension of Time	Unopposed First Motion For Extension Of Time	Document Links
		7/23/2021	7/26/2021	Judge Andrews	Notice - Proposed Order	Order On Motion To Quash  o quash service of process upon it on the grounds that it is not a party to the action	Document Links
		7/23/2021	7/26/2021	Alcoa Corporation	Motion - Motion Received	Motion To Quash Serv	Document Links
		4/22/2021	4/22/2021	Clerk	Notice - Notice of Entry of Judgment/Order	Notice Of Entry Of Order	Document Links
		4/22/2021	4/22/2021	Judge Willocks	Order - Order	Order	Document Links
		4/19/2021	4/20/2021	Alcoa, Inc.	Notice - Notice Of Service	Notion of Proof Of Service	Document Links
		4/6/2021	4/6/2021	Alcoa Corporation	Service - Summons Issued	Summons	Document Links
		3/31/2021	3/31/2021	Alcoa Corporation	Service - Summons Received	Summons	Document Links
		12/30/2020	12/30/2020	SCRG	Answer - Answer	SCRG’S Master Answer To The First Amended Complaint	Document Links
		12/15/2020	12/15/2020	Plaintiffs	First Amended Complaint (Exhibit to Notice)	Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint - Adding SCA and Alcoa as Defendants & Removing Asbestos	Document Links
		12/15/2020	12/15/2020	Plaintiffs	Notice - Notice of Filing	Notice Of Filing Stipulated Amended Complaint (with Amended Complaint and Comparison Copy as exhibits - see above)	Document Links
		10/1/2020	10/4/2020	SCRG	Motion - Motion to Dismiss	SCRG’S Rule 12 Motion To Dismiss	Document Links
		10/2/2020	10/2/2020	Clerk	Notice - Notice of Entry of Judgment/Order	Notice Of Entry Of Order	Document Links
		10/2/2020	10/2/2020	SCRG	Order - Order	Stipulation To Extend Time To Answer The New 219 Complaints	Document Links
		8/14/2020	8/14/2020	SCRG	Notice - Stipulation Received	Stipulation To Extend Time To Answer The New 219 Complaints	Document Links
		5/22/2020	5/22/2020	All Plaintiffs	Notice - Notice of Appearance	Notice Of Appearance	Document Links
		5/21/2020	5/21/2020	SCRG	Notice - Stipulation Received	Stipulation To Extend Time To Answer The New 219 Complaints	Document Links
		5/11/2020	5/11/2020	Plaintiffs	Notice - Notice of Filing	Notice Of Filing Certificate Of Service Of Certain Complaints	Document Links
		4/13/2020	4/13/2020	Clerk	Notice - Notice of Entry of Judgment/Order	Notice Of Entry Of Order	Document Links
		4/13/2020	4/13/2020	Judge Molloy	Order - Order	Order	Document Links
		2/12/2020	2/12/2020	SCRG	Response - Objection Received	Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group’s Notice Of Objections To February 3rd Order	Document Links
		2/12/2020	2/12/2020	SCRG	Notice - Notice of Appearance	Notice Of Appearance	Document Links
		2/3/2020	2/3/2020	Not In Court Docket	Initiating Document - Civil Complaint	Not In Court Docket	Document Links
		2/3/2020	2/3/2020	Not In Court Docket	Financial - Filing Fee Assess	Not In Court Docket	Document Links
		2/3/2020	2/3/2020	Clerk	Notice - Notice Of Entry	Notice Of Entry Of Order	Document Links
		2/3/2020	2/3/2020	Judge Molloy	Order - Order Signed	Order	Document Links
		2/3/2020	2/3/2020	Judge Molloy	Order - Order Signed	Order	Document Links
		2/3/2020	2/3/2020	Not In Court Docket	Action - Direct Judge Assignment	Not In Court Docket	Document Links
		In 2020 the VI Superior Court adopted its own Docketing System. It is located at: https://usvipublicaccess.vicourts.org/search/case
		Date Filed	DE#	Filer	Document(s)	Docket Entry
						[All Exhibits are attached to the documents]
		--------------	--------------------	----------	------------------------	From Two Prior Dockets Below:
		2/3/2020	SuperSTX Molloy	Court	Orders Removing SCRG from old Red Dust Cases and Beginning New Master Case out of the Abraham (550)	Main Order in 620
					(Combined)	Removal from 620
						Order to Clerk on New Case  (Master) SX-20-MC-9
						Main Controlling Order with Dates in 550
						Main Memorandum in 550
		3/22/2019	SuperSTX Molloy	Defendants	Defendants' Proposed Discovery Order
		3/22/2019	SuperSTX Molloy	Defendants	Notice to Court re Defendants Proposed Discovery Order
		3/21/2019	SuperSTX Molloy	SCRG	SCRG's Amended Party Information form
		3/15/2019	SuperSTX Molloy	Plaintiffs	Plaintiffs' Opposition (with suggestions) as to Defendants' Proposed Scheduling Order
		3/14/2019	SuperSTX Molloy	SCRG	SCRG's Reply re Show Cause Order as to disposition of "Eleanor Abraham" plaintiffs
		3/13/2019	SuperSTX Molloy	Other Defendants	Response Of Defendants Alcoa Inc. N/K/A Arconic Inc., St. Croix Alumina, Llc, And Glencore Ltd. To Plaintiffs’ Motion To Permit Use Of Prior Depositions Pursuant To V.I. R. Civ. P. 32(A)(8)
		3/13/2019	SuperSTX Molloy	Plaintiffs	Rohn Response to Molloy Show Cause Order re Remaining "Eleanor Abraham" Plaintiffs
		3/1/2019	SuperSTX Molloy	Plaintiffs	Rohn Reply as to Use of Past Depos and Materials
		2/22/2019	SuperSTX Molloy	Court	Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group's Response To Plaintiffs’ Filing As To Use Of Prior Depositions And Materials	As a WORD Document
		2/19/2019	SuperSTX Molloy	Court	Judge Molloy's Opinion as to SCRG Motion to Consolidate - Requiring Rohn filing in 21 days	Westlaw Version
		2/18/2019	SuperSTX Molloy	Defendants	Motion for additional Time as to discovery scheduling Order
		2/18/2019	SuperSTX Molloy	Rohn	Brief as to Use of Past Depositions and Mterials as Ordered by Court
		1/28/2019	SuperSTX	Rohn	Motion for Order that Plaintiffs May Prove Causation Through their Testimony
		1/24/2019	SuperSTX	Hearing	Transcript of Hearing before Judge Molloy re status and scheduling order
		1/24/2019	SuperSTX	Rohn	Motion to allow proof without expert testimony
		11/7/2018	SuperSTX	Court- Molloy	Notice of Hearing 2 pm on Thurs., January 24, 2019 - and Request re Recusal of Judge
		11/5/2018	SuperSTX	Court- Dunston	Dunston Orders Transferring Red Dust Master Case and included cases to Complex Lit Div and Judge Molloy
		7/24/2018	SuperSTX	Court- Brady	Brady Order Postponing Conference and Notice of Impending Transfer to Judge Molloy
		7/20/2018	SuperSTX	Court-Brady	Order Allowing Telephonic Attendance
		7/17/2018	SuperSTX	SCRG	Motion to Attend July 26th Status Conf by Telephone	Word Version
		3/27/2018	SuperSTX	SCRG	SCRG's 5th (Final) Rule 26 Production - Asbestos Documents
		2/15/2018	SuperSTX	SCRG	SCRG's 4th Rule 26 Production - SCRG Documents
		2/14/2018	SuperSTX	Plaintiffs	Opposition to Proposed Discovery Order
		2/9/2018	SuperSTX	Plaintiffs	Rohn Opposition to Memorandum to the Court as to Counsels Pro Hac Vice Status
		2/9/2018	SuperSTX	Defendants	Defendants' Proposed Discovery Order
		2/6/2018	SuperSTX	SCRG	SCRG’s 3rd Rule 26 production: BioImpact (“BIOI”), VI Department of Public Works (“DPWX”), Natural Resources Consultants Inc. (“NRCI”) and VI Waste Management Authority (“WMAu”)	WORD version
		2/5/2018	SuperSTX	All	Joint Report on Discovery (all parties)
		2/4/2018	SuperSTX	SCRG	SCRG Revised First Rule 26 Third Party Production - DPNR
		2/4/2018	SuperSTX	SCRG	SCRG Second Rule 26 Third Party Production - Alcoa Insurance
		1/19/2018	SuperSTX	Court	Two Orders from Judge Brady-- Show Cause and Discovery/Scheduling	ORDERED that counsel shall meet and confer and submit a joint proposed Discovery
						Order, no later than February 2, 2018. If the Parties are unable to agree, each Party shall file a
						proposed order within the same time frame.
						It is further
						ORDERED that this matter shall come on for a Status Conference on Thursday, July 26,
						2018 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 211.
						ORDERED that, within 30 days from the date of entry of this Order, Plaintiffs shall
						show cause, in writing, why this matter should not be dismissed against Defendant Glencore
						International AG, for Plaintiff's failure to serve Defendant Glencore International AG with process.
		1/18/2018	SuperSTX	Court	Hearing Transcript re Discovery, Pro Hac Vice, P's claims, etc.
		1/17/2018	SuperSTX	Glencore & SCA/Alcoa	Motion to Allow Off-Island Attys to practice in 432 cases without applying or fees
		1/17/2018	SuperSTX	Plaintiffs	Plaintiffs' Response to D's Report to the Court re Discovery Plan
		1/16/2018	SuperSTX	Defendants	Defendants’ Report to the Court with Exhibit A (Questionnaire) and the Proposed Discovery Order
		1/10/2018	SuperSTX	Plaintiffs	2 Verifications	Torres, Catty D. & Berrios, Lucy Perez et al
		1/8/2018	SuperSTX	COURT	Order changing Rule 16 Hearing to 2 pm on 1/18/2018
		1/4/2018	SuperSTX	Glencore	432 Glencore Red Dust Answers in a Single PDF file - bookmarked	there were 2 different Certificates of Service
						Cert 2
						Sample of Glencore Answer (Lugo)
		1/2/2018	SuperSTX	SCA	SCA-Alcoa 432 Red Dust Answers	Certificate of Service
						Sample SCA-Alcoa Answer (Lugo)
		1/2/2018	SuperSTX	SCRG	SCRG's Certificate of Service in Main Red Dust Case	SCRG....certifies that on January 2, 2012, pursuant to the Order of this Court, it did serve its Answers by Dropbox and email as agreed to by the parties, on the 1376 Plaintiffs in the 432 individual sub-cases, as follows: (list of all Plaintiffs and cases)
						Sample SCRG Answer (Lugo)
						Stamped First Page from Clerk 1/4/2018
		1/2/2018	SuperSTX	SCRG	432 SCRG Red Dust Answers in Bookmarked PDF File
		1/2/2018			All Red Dust Complaints as Collected for Answers	Collected by Review of Physical Files at Court Clerk 12/28/2017 by Jay Sheen and Andy Simpson
						Really large (287 Mb) - Takes a long time to download - 3 min @ HS
						Sample new Complaint (Lugo)
		12/29/2017	SuperSTX	SCRG	SCRG's Revised Certification as to Outstanding Motions and Matters
		12/28/2017	SuperSTX	SCRG	SCRG's Certification as to Outstanding Motions and Matters	Voided by Revision
		12/28/2017	SuperSTX	Plaintiffs	Motion to reschedule Conference set for January 18th
		12/11/2017	SuperSTX	Court	Revised Scheduling Order	First, any party's failure to adhere to the deadlines in the July 7, 2017 Interim Scheduling Order, as extended by this Court or tolled by the Supreme Court, is EXCUSED.
						Second, each Defendant shall file a response to the individual complaints within twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this Order, whether the response is an answer or a motion filed pursuant to Virgin Islands Rule of Civil Procedure 12. All motions filed pursuant to Rule 12 shall be filed per the deadlines set by the rules, with the effective date the date of entry of this Order. In other words, the parties shall proceed as if the date of entry of this Order is the date when service of process occurred for all individual complaints.
						Third, any party who previously filed an answer to the claims asserted herein, whether in Abednego, Henry, or Phillip Abraham, is precluded from filing a motion pursuant to Virgin Islands Rule of Civil Procedure 12(6)(2)-(6).
						Fourth, each party shall, within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this Order, file a notice in the master case (if not already filed) that: (A) lists by date filed (1) each motion still pending filed by that party; (2) in which case(s) the motion(s) was(were) filed; (3) which parties, if any, joined the motion(s); and (4) the relief sought by each motion and the grounds therefor, e.g., dismissal based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction; and (B) states whether the party (1) seeks leave to supplement the previously-filed motion(s) or (2) intends to withdraw the previously-filed motion(s) and to refile it.
						Fifth, because filing a motion does not necessarily suspend deadlines or excuse parties from complying with court deadlines, and further because "the Henry plaintiffs exchanged discovery with the defendants over the first two years of the litigation, namely between 1999 and 2001, and then for about five more years, the parties traveled the country deposed fact and expert witnesses," Abednego v. St. Croix Alumina, LLC, 63 V.I. 153, 186-87 (Super. Ct. 2015) (brackets, quotation marks, and citations omitted), there remains no reason to delay discovery in these cases. From the bench on August 2, 2017, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer by Monday, October 16, 2017, and to file joint or separate discovery plans by Tuesday, October 31, 20 I 7. Counsel were unable to meet with those deadlines in part due to Hurricanes Irma and Maria. Those deadlines are hereby extended as follows: on or before Friday, January 5, 2018, counsel shall meet and confer pursuant to Virgin Islands Rule of Civil Procedure 26 and serve and file their discovery plans/reports on or before Monday, January 15, 2018. The Rule 16 conference scheduled from the bench on August 2, 2017 will proceed as scheduled on January 18, 2018 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 211.
		8/30/2017	SuperSTX	SCRG	Motion to Consolidate 550 and 620
			SuperSTX	Plaintiffs	Additional 12 Complaints Filed
		8/1/2017	SuperSTX	Plaintiffs	222 Complaints filed
		8/1/2017	SuperSTX	SCRG	Notice of Minor Technical Deficiencies
		7/21/2017	SuperSTX	Century	Notice re Existing Motions to Dismiss	Stands on existing and seeks leave to amend
		7/21/2017	SuperSTX	Glencore Alcoa & SCA	Notice re Existing Motions to Dismiss	States no new MTD will be filed
		7/7/2017	SuperSTX	Court	Brady 3 of 3 Orders - 571	ORDERED that the Response to Court Order Regarding Refiled Complaint, filed by Plaintiff
						Laurie L.A. Abednego, through counsel, on September 14, 2016 is CONSTRUED as a motion and
						DENIED as moot. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this Order, Plaintiff Laurie
						L.A. Abednego shall serve and file his verified, amended complaint. Failure to comply will result in
						dismissal.
		7/7/2017	SuperSTX	Court	Brady 2 of 3 Orders - 163	Conclusion
						For the reasons stated above, the Court will grant Century's January 13, 2016 motion for
						extension of time to move, answer, or otherwise respond, grant Co-Plaintiffs' May 2, 2016 second
						motion for extension of time to file individual verified complaints, and deny Co-Plaintiffs' June 2,
						2016 motion for brief extension of time. The Court will construe Abraham's September 13, 2016
						response to court order and Abednego's September 14, 2016 response to court order as motions and
						grant the first and deny the second as moot. Orders consistent with this opinion follow.
		7/7/2017	SuperSTX	Court	Brady 1 of 3 Orders - 620	The court lists all of the cases to date:  09-571 (Abednago), 11-163 (Abraham), and 15-621 through 15-827 (total of 208) -- and consolidates them "for pre-trial purposes only" into 620.
						Case Management Order and interim Scheduling Order attached.
						Case Management Order
						Interim Scheduling Order
						Westlaw Version
		7/7/2017	SuperSTX	Court	Substitutions of Counsel	ORDERED that the Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel filed by Defendant Century
						Aluminum Company on September 13, 2013 is GRANTED and Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak &
						Stewart, LLC is RELIEVED as counsel of record in this matter, nunc pro tune. It is further
						ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this Order, David J. Cattie,
						Esq. shall serve and file a notice regarding the status of the pro hac vice admission of Eric C. Schweizer
						Order and take appropriate steps if necessary to cause him to withdraw his appearance in this matter.
		8/10/2013	SuperSTX	Court	Opinion	Begins with History of Litigation - Opinion in Abdednego v. SCA et. al. - 2015 WL 4760285
			STX		Docket	July 2017 Docket Sheet for Phillip Abraham SX-2011-CV-163
			STX		Complaint	--Original Complaint in Phillip Abraham Case
			STX		Docket	SX-09-CV-571 - July 2017 VI Superior Docket Sheet for Abednego
			Fed Ct		Docket	1:12-cv-00011-HB - Closed Federal Docket Sheet for Eleanor Abraham
			Fed Ct		Docket	1:10-cv-00009-H - Closed Federal Case Docket Sheet for Abednego
			Fed Ct		Docket	1:99-cv-00036-HB - Closed Federal Case Docket Sheet for Josephat Henry
			Fed Ct		Docket	1:06-cv-00154-HB - Closed Federal Case Docket Sheet for Bennington v. SCRG
		---------------
		11/26/2013	S.Ct.	SCRG	Reply re Cert
		11/21/2013	S.Ct.	Plaintiffs	Opposition to Petition for Cert
		11/15/2013	Dist Ct	SCRG	Notice of Status of Petition
		10/17/2013	S.Ct.	Court	Grant of time to November 22	No. 13-116
						Title:	St. Croix Renaissance Group , L.L.L.P., Petitioner
							v.
							Eleanor Abraham, et al.
						Docketed:	26-Jul-13
						Lower Ct:	United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
						Case Nos.:	(13-1725)
						Decision Date:	17-May-13
						~~~Date~~~	~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
						Jul 23 2013	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2013)
						Jul 29 2013	Waiver of right of respondents Eleanor Abraham, et al. to respond filed.
						Aug 7 2013	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.
						Sep 23 2013	Response Requested . (Due October 23, 2013)
						Oct 17 2013	Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 22, 2013.
						~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
						Attorneys for Petitioner:
						Carl Joseph Hartmann
						Party name: St. Croix Renaissance Group , L.L.L.P.
						Attorneys for Respondent:
						Leah M. Nicholls
						Counsel of Record
						Party name: Eleanor Abraham, et al.
			S.Ct	Respond	Request for Extension of time to file response
		9/23/2013	S.Ct.	Court	Call for Response (CFR) to Respondents from Supreme Court
		7/23/2013	S.Ct.	SCRG	Notice of Filing of Pet for Cert to DVI
		7/23/2013	S.Ct.	SCRG	Petition for Writ of Certiorari
		5/22/2013	47	SCRG	Notice of Intent to File Petition for Cert.	NOTICE Intent to File Pet. Cert. by St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P. (Hartmann, Carl)
		5/17/2013	3dCir	SCRG	Opinion	JUDGMENT, Affirmed. Costs taxed against Appellant. (DW)
		5/13/2013	3dCir	SCRG	SCRG'a Motion to Stay Determination and For Enlargement of Time	ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant St Croix Renaissance to stay 28 USC 1453(c) stay and enlargement. Certificate of Service dated 05/13/2013. (CJH)
		4/16/2013	3dCir	Court	Oral Argument	Philadelphia. Oral Argument 3:00 pm before Judges Smith, Ambro and Chagares. In the Maris Courtroom, 19th Floor. PDF Version
		4/1/2013	3dCir	SCRG	SCRG's Reply Letter Brief	ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC REPLY BRIEF on behalf of Appellant St Croix Renaissance, filed. Certificate of Service dated 04/01/2013 by ECF, US mail. (CJH) WORD Version
		3/28/2013	3dCir	Plaint	Appellees Opposition Brief	ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC BRIEF on behalf of Appellee Eleanor Abraham, filed. Certificate of Service dated 03/28/2013 by 3rd party, ECF. (LMN)
		3/21/2013	3dCir	Court	Notice of Receipt of Hard Copy of Documents (Entry Only) (BRIEF)	HARD COPY RECEIVED from Appellant St Croix Renaissance - Letter Brief with Volume I of Appendix attached. Copies: 10. (SJB)
		3/21/2013	3dCir	Court	Notice of Receipt of Hard Copy of Documents (Entry Only) (APPENDIX)	HARD COPY RECEIVED from Appellant St Croix Renaissance - Joint Appendix. Copies: 4. Volumes: 2 (Volume I attached to Letter Brief). (EAF)
		3/20/2013	3dCir	SCRG	Leah Nicholls - Acknowledgment of Notification of Oral Argument and Desig of Counsel	ECF FILER: ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed by Attorney Leah M. Nicholls, Esq. for Appellee Eleanor Abraham. Certificate of Service dated 03/20/2013. (LMN)
		3/20/2013	3dCir	SCRG	Carl Hartmann - Acknowledgment of Notification of Oral Argument and Desig of Counsel	ECF FILER: ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed by Attorney Carl J. Hartmann, III, Esq. for Appellant St Croix Renaissance. Certificate of Service dated 03/20/2013. (CJH)
		3/20/2013	3dCir	Court	Notice or Scheduling of Oral Argument	Calendared for Tuesday, 04/16/2013. (TLW)
						The Court has that oral argument in the above-entitled case is scheduled on the merits on Tuesday, April 16, 2013. Counsel will be allotted 15 minutes oral argument time for each side, pursuant to Rule 12(6) of the Rules of this Circuit. Court will convene at 3:00 PM in The Albert Branson Maris Courtroom (19th Floor, U.S. Courthouse, 6th & Market Sts.) Counsel who will present oral argument should register with the Court Crier in the courtroom 30 minutes prior to the time when court is scheduled to convene.
		3/20/2013	3dCir	SCRG	Appellant's Brief	Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC LETTER BRIEF with Volume I of Appendix attached on behalf of Appellant St Croix Renaissance, filed. Certificate of Service dated 03/20/2013 by hand delivery, ECF. [Text edited]--[Edited 03/20/2013 by EAF] (CJH) WORD Version
					w/ Appendix Vol 1 attached
		3/20/2013	3dCir	SCRG	Appendix Vol 1 (removed by clerk as filed w brief)	Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann)
		3/20/2013	3dCir	SCRG	Appendix Vol 2	Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC JOINT APPENDIX on behalf of Appellant St Croix Renaissance, filed. Certificate of service dated 03/20/2013 by ECF. [Volume I has been removed as it is attached to the Brief]--[Edited 03/20/2013 by EAF] (CJH)
		3/20/2013	3dCir	SCRG	Hartmann Enrty of Appearance	Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Carl J. Hartmann III on behalf of Appellant(s) St. Croix Renaissance Group L.L.L.P. (CJH)
		3/20/2013	3dCir	SCRG	Holt Entry of Appearance	Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Joel H. Holt on behalf of Appellant(s) St. Croix Renaissance Group L.L.L.P.. (CJH)
		3/20/2013	3dCir	SCRG	Transcript Request form	Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant St Croix Renaissance advising this court that no transcripts are available. (CJH)
		3/20/2013	3dCir	SCRG	Concise Summary of the Case	Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant St Croix Renaissance, received. (CJH)
		3/20/2013	3dCir	SCRG	SCRG Corporate Disclosure Statement	Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant St Croix Renaissance, filed. (CJH)
		3/20/2013	3dCir	SCRG	Civil Appeal Info Statement	Appeal Filing of 3/20/2013 (Hartmann) ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant St Croix Renaissance, filed. (CJH)
		3/20/2013	3dCir	Plain	Entry of Appearance of Leah Nichools of Public Interest	ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Leah M. Nicholls on behalf of Appellee(s) Eleanor Abraham, et al.. (LMN)
						Supreme Court Assistance Project Fellow at Public Citizen Litigation Group and clerked for Texas Supreme Court Justice Harriet O'Neill. She is a magna cum laude graduate of Duke University Law School.  She has also clerked for the Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs at the Arizona Center for Disability Law.  She is now the the Kazan-Budd Attorney at PI. She was previously senior staff attorney for civil rights and general public interest at the Georgetown University Law Center's Institute for Public Representation. Leah had also been a teaching fellow and law professor at the Law Center.
		3/14/2013	3dCir	Court	Case Opening Letter
		3/14/2013	3dCir	Holt	Notice of paying Fees	ECF FILER: LETTER from Attorney Joel H. Holt, Esq. for Petitioner St Croix Renaissance Petitioner gives notice of having paid filing and docketing fee. Certificate of Service dated 03/14/2013. (JHH)
		3/14/2013	3dCir	Court	Order Expediting Appeal	ORDER (AMBRO, SMITH and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges) The appeal will be EXPEDITED. The parties are hereby ordered to file informal double-spaced letter briefs on the following schedule: 1. Appellant's Letter Brief and Joint Appendix to be filed and served by March 21, 2013: 2. Appellees' Letter Brief to be file and served by March 28, 2013; and 3. Appellant's Reply Brief, if any, to be filed and served by April 02, 2013. Opening briefs must not exceed 20 pages and the reply brief must not exceed 10 pages. The appeal will be calendared before this Panel for oral argument on April 16, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. Panel No.: DCO-038. SMITH, Authoring Judge. (DW)
		3/14/2013	3dCir	Court	No Document	RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (DW)
		3/14/2013	3dCir	Court	No Document	CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Transferred from Misc. No. 12-8114. Notice filed by Appellant St Croix Renaissance in District Court No. 1-12-cv-00011. (DW)
		3/14/2013	3dCir	Court	Order Granting leave to Appeal	ORDER (AMBRO, SMITH and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges) The foregoing Petition is hereby GRANTED. The motion to strike is DENIED. This order granting the petition for leave to appeal will serve as the notice of appeal and will be forwarded to the district court. Petitioner/Appellant must pay the $455.00 docketing and filing fee in the district court within two days of the date of this order. Petitioner/Appellant is directed to notify the Clerk's office, in writing, that the fee has been paid in accordance with this order. Petitioner/Appellant may file the notification electronically in No. 12-8114 using the Letter to the Court event in the Court's electronic case filing (ECF) system. Upon payment, this miscellaneous proceeding will be closed and a new appeal will be opened on the general docket. All filing discussed below must be done electronically in the new appeal. The appeal will be EXPEDITED. The parties are hereby ordered to file informal double-spaced letter briefs on the following schedule: 1. Appellant's Letter Brief and Joint Appendix to be filed and served by March 21, 2013; 2. Appellees' Letter Brief to be filed and served by March 28, 2013; and 3. Appellant's Reply Brief, if any, to be filed and served by April 2, 2013. Opening briefs must not exceed 20 pages and the reply brief must not exceed 10 pages. The appeal will be calendared before this Panel for oral argument on April 16, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. The Clerk is directed to file a copy of this order in the new appeal. , filed. Panel No.: DCO-038. SMITH, Authoring Judge. (DW)
		1/11/2013	3dCir	SCRG	Petitioner's Reply to -- Respondents’ response in opposition to motion to strike	ECF FILER: Reply by Petitioner St Croix Renaissance to Response Response , filed. Certificate of Service dated 01/11/2013. (CJH) WORD
					or in the alternative for leave to file a cross-answer
					in opposition regarding respondents de facto cross
					petition for review of a CAFA remand order pursuant to 28 USC § 1453(c)(1)
		1/10/2013	3dCir	Rohn	Respondents’ response in opposition to motion to strike	ECF FILER: Response filed by Respondent Eleanor Abraham to Motion to Strike, Motion. Certificate of Service dated 01/10/2013. (LJR)
					or in the alternative for leave to file a cross-answer
					in opposition regarding respondents de facto cross
					petition for review of a CAFA remand order pursuant to 28 USC § 1453(c)(1)
		12/27/2012	3dCir	SCRG	Motion to Strike or in the alternative file a Cross-Answer	Motion filed by Petitioner St Croix Renaissance to strike portions of Respondents' Opposition or, alternatively, for leave to file a to Cross-Answer to de facto Cross-Petition. Certificate of Service dated 12/27/2012. (CJH) WORD
		12/21/2012	3dCir	Rohn	Response to Petition	Response filed by Respondent Eleanor Abraham to original proceeding Petition Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1453(c). Certificate of Service dated 12/21/2012. (LJR)
		12/14/2012	43	SCRG	Notice of filing of Petition to Third Circuit in 12-8114	NOTICE Of Filing of Petition to Third Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1453(c)(1) by St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Petition, # (2) Exhibit Docket Entry) (Hartmann, Carl)
		12/12/2012	3dCir	SCRG	Petition for Appeal regarding the Order of Remand	PETITION FOR DE NOVO REVIEW OF A CAFA REMAND ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C § 1453(c)(1)(Sent and served on Rohn 12/12/2012) WORD and AS FILED (Docketed 3d Cir. 12/13/2012)
		12/7/2012	42	Court	Memorandum re Order Remanding to Superior Court	MEMORANDUM OPINION re: [36] Motion for Remand. (HB) dated 12/7/2012 (CB)
		12/7/2012	41	Court	Order Remanding to Superior Court	ORDER (HB) dated 12/7/2012 granting [36] Motion to Remand. (CB)
		11/16/2012	40	SCRG	REPLY [Agreement] to Motion for Extension of Time Nunc Pro Tunc	REPLY to Motion for Extension of Time Nunc Pro Tunc filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. Responses due by 11/29/2012 (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 11/16/2012)
		11/16/2012	39	Rohn	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to Opposition to Motion Nunc Pro Tunc	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 37 Opposition to Motion, 38 Reply to Opposition to Motion Nunc Pro Tunc by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Text of Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 11/16/2012)
		11/16/2012	38	Rohn	Plaintiffs' Reply to the Opposition to Motion for Remand	REPLY to Opposition to Motion re [37] Opposition to Motion filed by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... (Attachments: # (1) xhibit, # (2) Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit) (Rohn, Lee)
		10/29/2012	37	SCRG	SCRG's Opposition to Motion for Remand	Opposition to Motion re [36] MOTION to Remand /Motion to Remand for Lack of Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit) (Holt, Joel) WORD
		10/24/2012	36	Rohn	Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand	MOTION to Remand /Motion to Remand for Lack of Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee)
		10/24/2012	35	Court	Scheduling Order for Motion for Remand	Minute Order. Proceedings held in chambers before US District Judge Harvey Bartle, III: Telephone Conference held on 0/23/2012. (CB)
		10/24/2012	34	Court	Scheduling Order for Motion for Remand	ORDER that Plantiffs shall file and serve their motion to remand by 10/30/2012; Defendant shall file an opposition by 11/5/2012; Plaintiff shall file any reply by 11/15/2012. (HB) dated 10/24/2012 (CB) (Entered: 10/24/2012)
		10/23/2012	33	Rohn	Emergency Motion to Continue	MOTION to Continue /Emergency Motion to Continue the October 23, 2012 Telephone Conference to 4:30 p.m. by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 10/23/2012)
		10/12/2012	32	Court	Judge Bartle Assigned	ORDER REASSIGNING CASE (CVG) this case is reassigned to Judge Harvey Bartle, III, for all further proceedings. Judge Wilma A. Lewis is no longer assigned to this case. (This is a text entry only. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.) (DHK) (Entered: 10/12/2012)
		9/25/2012	31	SCRG	SCRGs Reply to Plaintiffs Memo in Opp to Motion to Sever	REPLY to Opposition to Motion re 28 Opposition to Motion [TO SEVER] filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 09/25/2012)
		9/25/2012	30	SCRG	REPLY to Opposition to Motion FOR A MORE	REPLY to Opposition to Motion re 29 Opposition to Motion [FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT] filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 09/25/2012)
					DEFINITE STATEMENT
		9/19/2012	29	Rohn	Opposition to Motion for More Definite Statement	Opposition to Motion re 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 09/19/2012)
		9/19/2012	28	Rohn	Opposition to Motion to Sever	Opposition to Motion re 16 MOTION to Sever filed by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 09/19/2012)
		9/13/2012	27	SCRG	Opposition to Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 17 Memorandum in Support to Motion	Opposition to Motion re 26 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 17 Memorandum in Support to Motion, 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement , 16 MOTION to Sever , 19 Memorandum in Support to Motion filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Hartmann, Carl) (Entered: 09/13/2012)
		9/12/2012	26	SCRG	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 17 Memorandum in Support to Motion, 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement , 16 MOTION to Sever , 19 Memorandum in Support to Motion by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W Cannon. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 09/12/2012)
		9/12/2012	25	SCRG	MOTION and Memorandum to Deem Conceded Defendant's Motions to Sever and for a More Definite Statement	MOTION and Memorandum to Deem Conceded Defendant's Motions to Sever and for a More Definite Statement re 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement , 16 MOTION to Sever by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W Cannon. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Hartmann, Carl) (Entered: 09/12/2012)
		8/21/2012	24	Rohn	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to MOTION to Sever	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 16 MOTION to Sever by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W Cannon. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 08/21/2012)
		8/21/2012	23	Rohn	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to Mot. for	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W Cannon. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 08/21/2012)
					More Definite Statement
		8/7/2012	22	Rohn	First Amended Compliant	AMENDED Complaint Plaintiffs' First Amended against All Plaintiffs filed by Eleanor Abraham, et al... (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 08/07/2012)
					(re-filed without permission)
		8/7/2012	21	Rohn	NOTICE of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's First Amended Compliant Rohn	NOTICE of Withdrawal of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint , Doc No 15 by Eleanor Abraham, et al.. re 15 Amended Complaint (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 08/07/2012)
		8/6/2012	20	SCRG	Incorrect filing	NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY Re: 20 Reply to. Pleading docketed in wrong case. Should have been docketed in Civil No. 2011/0088. To be corrected by attorney's office. (NH) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
						REPLY to [REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT] filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. Responses due by 8/20/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
		8/6/2012	19	SCRG	MEMORANDUM in Support re MOTION for More Definite Statement	MEMORANDUM in Support re 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C) (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
		8/6/2012	18	SCRG	MOTION for More Definite Statement	MOTION for More Definite Statement by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W Cannon. (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
		8/6/2012	17	SCRG	MEMORANDUM in Support re MOTION to Sever	MEMORANDUM in Support re 16 MOTION to Sever filed by Defendant St.
						Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, #
						3 Exhibit C) (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
		8/6/2012	16	SCRG	MOTION to Sever	MOTION to Sever by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.. (Holt,
						Joel) (Entered: 08/06/2012)
		8/2/2012	15	Rohn	(First) AMENDED COMPLAINT Rohn	AMENDED Complaint against St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.filed by
						Eleanor Abraham, et al... (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 08/02/2012)
					(But see DE 22)	ORDER (GWC) dated 8/1/2012 granting 5 Motion for Leave to File First
						Amended Complaint (KMD) (Entered: 08/01/2012)
		8/1/2012	14	Court	ORDER (GWC) dated 8/1/2012 granting Motion for Leave to File First	ORDER (GWC) dated 8/1/2012 granting 5 Motion for Leave to File First
					Amended Complaint	Amended Complaint (KMD) (Entered: 08/01/2012)
		5/1/2012	13	Court	[Order] NOTICE of Response to Plaintiffs' 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File	NOTICE of Response to Plaintiffs' 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File.
						(WAL) dated 5/1/2012. (GS) (Entered: 05/01/2012)
		4/16/2012	12	SCRG	REPLY to Opposition to Motion for More Definite Statement and for Severence	REPLY to Opposition to Motion re 6 Notice (Other) [Motion for More Definite
						Statement and for Severence] filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group,
						L.L.L.P.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit B−1, # 4 Exhibit
						B−2, # 5 Exhibit B−3) (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 04/16/2012)
		4/16/2012	11	SCRG	Opposition to Motion to Amend/Correct and leave to file First	Opposition to Motion re 5 MOTION to Amend/Correct and leave to file First
					Amended Complaint	Amended Complaint filed by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P..
						(Holt, Joel) (Entered: 04/16/2012)
		4/12/2012	10	Rohn	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand	MOTION for Extension of Time to File Plaintiffs' Third Motion to Remand for
						lack of Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al...
						Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W Cannon. (Attachments: # 1
						Supplement, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Text of Proposed Order) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered:
						04/12/2012)
		3/26/2012	9	Court	Order	ORDER granting Stipulation 8 . Defendant shall have until April 16, 2012 to file
						its responses to 5 and [6−1]. (GWC) dated 3/26/2012 (CB) (Entered: 03/26/2012)
		3/19/2012	8	SCRG	STIPULATION [FOR EXTENSION OF TIME] by SCRG	STIPULATION [FOR EXTENSION OF TIME] by St. Croix Renaissance Group,
						L.L.L.P.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Holt, Joel) (Entered:
						03/19/2012)
		3/15/2012	7	SCRG	NOTICE of Appearance by Carl J Hartmann, III	NOTICE of Appearance by Carl J Hartmann, III on behalf of Defendant St. Croix
						Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P. (Hartmann, Carl) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
		3/15/2012	6	Rohn	NOTICE of filing response to Def	NOTICE of filing response to Def [doc 1, exh C] by Eleanor Abraham, et al.. re 1
						Notice of Removal (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Response to Def's [1, exh 3])
						(Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
		3/15/2012	5	Rohn	MOTION to Amend/Correct and leave to file First Amended Complain	MOTION to Amend/Correct and leave to file First Amended Complaint by
						Plaintiff Eleanor Abraham, et al... Motions referred to Magistrate Judge George W
						Cannon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered:
						03/15/2012)
		2/10/2012	4	Rohn	[Filing Fee] NOTICE TO THE COURT	NOTICE TO THE COURT by Eleanor Abraham, et al.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit
						1) (Rohn, Lee) (Entered: 02/14/2012)
						Filing fee: $ 350.00, receipt number 100002085 on 2/10/2012 (MB). (Entered:
						02/10/2012)
		2/2/2012	3	SCRG	ANSWER to Complaint	ANSWER to Complaint by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P..
						(Holt, Joel) (Entered: 02/02/2012)
		2/2/2012	2	SCRG	NOTICE of Appearance by Joel H. Holt	NOTICE of Appearance by Joel H. Holt on behalf of Defendant St. Croix
						Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P. (Holt, Joel) (Entered: 02/02/2012)
		2/2/2012	1	SCRG	Notice of Removal	NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Defendant St. Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P.
						from Superior Court of the Virgins Islands, case number 11 − CV − 550. ( Filing
					(with Original Sup. Ct. pleadings attached) Original Super. Ct. Complaint is Ex. A	fee $ 350) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C) (Holt, Joel)
						(Entered: 02/02/2012)
			44562		Attachment with Client information to Original Complaint as filed in USVI Superior Court